Solvency Analysis by Business Classifications of General Insurance Industry in Malaysia
AbstractA healthy and well developed insurance industry will improve the stability of an economy by transferring risks to various parties through insurance and reinsurance activities. Insurance companies’ performances have direct impact on the public welfare, to the regulatory authorities and to potential investors. Insolvency within the insurance industry has become a major concern and identification of potentially troubled firms has become a major regulatory research objective. The regulatory authority of the insurance industry in Malaysia has made compulsory the employment of risk-based capital (RBC) on the insurance industry with the objective to measure the minimum amount of capital required by an insurance company to ensure the continuous solvency and smooth running of the insurer's business operations. The measurement of RBC known as the capital adequacy ratio (CAR) must be adopted by each insurance company. However, different methods are practiced by other countries in allocating RBC. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of different insurance policies offered by the general insurance companies using the RBC system enforced by BNM and the RBC based on Butsic method. Study uses annual financial reports data of nineteen general insurance companies in Malaysia from 2009 to 2015. Results of the capital adequacy ratio (CAR) and expected policy deficit (EPD) found that the personal accident policy to be the most profitable and ensure solvency for the general insurance companies.
Brockett, P. L., W. W. Cooper, L. L. Golden, and U. Pitaktong, 1994, A Neural Network Method for Obtaining an Early Warning of Insurer Insolvency, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 61: 402-424.
Bodie, Z., Kane, A. & Marcus, A, Jain R. 2014. Investments. McGraw-Hill Asia Global Edition: Singapore.
Hooker, N.D., Bulmer, J. R., Cooper, S.M., Green, P.A.G., Hinton, P.H. 1996. Risk-Based Capital in General Insurance. British Actuarial Journal 2 (2): 265-323.
Barth, M.M. 2000. A comparison of risk-based capital standards under the expected policyholder deficit and the probability of ruin approaches. The Journal of Risk Finance 67(3): 397 – 413.
Butsic, R.B. 1994. Solvency measurement for property-liability risk-based capital applications. The Journal of Risk and Insurance 61(4): 656-690.
Persatuan Insurans Am Malaysia. (2019). General Insurance Industry Grew 1.5% in 2018. www.piam.org.my. 6th July 2019
Yakob, R., Yusop, Z., Radam, A., & Ismail, N. (2012). Camel Rating Approach to Assess the Insurance Operators Financial Strength. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 46(2), 3-15.
Ismail, M. (2013). Determinants of financial performance: The case of general takaful and insurance companies in Malaysia. International Review of Business Research Papers, 9(6): 111-130.
Jaaman, S.H., Ismail, N., & Majid, N. (2007). Assessing risk and financial strength of general insurers in Malaysia. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis, 3(1): 65-73.
Lazam, N.M., Tafri, F.H., & Shahruddin, S.N.S.S.M. (2012, September). Impact of the Risk Based Capital implementation: A case study on an insurance company in Malaysia. In Statistics in Science, Business, and Engineering (ICSSBE) International Conference
Chiet, N.S., Jaaman, S.H., Ismail, N., & Shamsuddin, S.M. (2009, December). Insolvency prediction model using artificial neural network for Malaysian general insurers. In World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing, 2009. NaBIC 2009: 584-589. IEEE.
Aida Y.Y., Wee Y.L., Ahmad F.O. 2016. A critical analysis of the Malaysian Risk Based Capital framework: A comparison between General Insurance and Takaful. Institutions and Economics 8 (4): 23-41.
Cummins, J.D., Harrington, S., & Niehaus, G. (1993). An economic overview of risk-based capital requirements for the property-liability insurance industry. Journal of Insurance Regulation, 11(4): 427-447
Holzmüller, I. (2009). The United States RBC standards, Solvency II and the Swiss solvency test: a comparative assessment. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 34(1), 56-77.
Mafimisebi, O. P. 2018. Risky business: Data on trading results for UK general insurance firms during and after the global financial crisis. Data in Brief, 21: 2384-2389
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- By submitting the processing fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.
- It should be clear for authors that the Editor In Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper. The Editor In Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor In Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 7 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor In Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he have the right to accept\reject the paper.B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s). C. the Editor In Chief himself evaluates the paper.
- Author will take the responsibility what so ever if any copyright infringement or any other violation of any law is done by publishing the research work by the author
- Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.
- If at any time, due to any legal reason, if the journal stops accepting manuscripts or could not publish already accepted manuscripts, we will have the right to cancel all or any one of the manuscripts without any compensation or returning back any kind of processing cost.
- The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.