How to Conduct a Qualitative Systematic Review to Guide Evidence-Based Practice in Radiography
Keywords:
Evidence-based Practice, Qualitative, Radiography, Systematic ReviewAbstract
In recent years, there has been emphasis on evidence-based practice. Traditionally, systematic reviews of quantitative evidence on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and the effectiveness of technology in radiography provided the evidence on which to base decisions for patients and policies. However, there has been a recognition that to have in-depth understanding into human behaviour, opinions and experiences also requires evidence-based literature from systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. Unfortunately, there is limited educational literature on how to conduct systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. Therefore, this article provides this information to radiographers, radiography students and other healthcare professionals. This information is applicable in both clinical and educational settings.
References
. Khan KS, Kunz R, Kliejnen J, Antes G. Systematic reviews to support evidence‐based medicine. How to review and apply findings of healthcare research. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited; 2011.
. Bettany-Saltikov J. How to do a systematic literature review in nursing -A step by step guide. Berkshire: Open University Press; 2012.
. Yannascoli SM, Schenker ML, Carey JL, Ahn J, Baldwin KD. How to write a systematic review: A step-by-step guide. University of Pennsylvania Orthopaedic Journal. 2013; 23: 64-69.
. Dickson R, Cherry MG, Boland A. Carrying out a systematic review as a masters’ thesis. In: Boland A, Cherry MG, Dickson R, Eds. Doing a Systematic Review-Student’s Guide (2nd Edition). London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2017: 1-20.
. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (9th edition). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd; 2017.
. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th edition). London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2018.
. Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2012;12 (181).
. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. 2015. Available from http://www.prisma-statement.org/ (accessed on 12 January 2020).
. Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. 2020. Available from https:// health.ebsco.com/products/the-cinahl-database (accessed on 10 January 2020).
. ScienceDirect. 2020. Available from https://www.sciencedirect.com/(accessed on 16 January 2020).
. Dundar Y. Fleeman N. Developing my search strategy. In: Boland A, Cherry MG, Dickson R, Eds. Doing a Systematic Review-Student’s Guide. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2017: 61-78.
. Critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) checklist for qualitative research. 2018. Available from https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/(accessed on 18 January 2020).
. Nelwatia, Abdullah KL, Chan CM. A systematic review of qualitative studies exploring peer learning experiences of undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today. 2018. 71: 185-192.
. Fleeman N, Dundar Y. Data extraction: Where do I begin? In: Boland A, Cherry MG, Dickson R, Eds. Doing a Systematic Review-Student’s Guide (2nd Edition). London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2017: 93-106.
. Cherry MG, Smith H, Perkins E, Boland A. Reviewing qualitative evidence. In: Boland A, Cherry MG, Dickson R, Eds. Doing a Systematic Review-Student’s Guide (2nd Edition). London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2017: 192-222.
. Abrantes AFCL, Ribeiro LPV, Da Silva CA, England A, Azevedo KB, Almeida RPP, Canha Reis MV. Evidence-based radiography: A new methodology or the systematisation of an old practice? Radiography. 2020; 26(2): 127-132.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.
