The Use of the Health Belief Model to Determine the Differences in Employees’ Beliefs and Perceptions About Hand Washing, Mask Wearing, and Social Distancing to Prevent the Spread of the COVID-19 Virus in a Higher Learning Institution in Trinidad and Toba
AbstractCOVID-19 is a new viral disease that has caused a pandemic in the world. Due to the lack of vaccines and definitive treatment, preventive behaviours are the only way to overcome the disease. This study has been motivated by the desire to change to the prevalence of these unaccepted health behaviours and so produce improvement in community health and eventually gain an understanding of the reasons why individuals perform a variety of behaviours. The researcher used the health belief model, which explores four constructs: perceived susceptibility (five questions), perceived severity (five questions), perceived benefits (five questions), and perceived barriers (five questions). The results of the analysis have revealed no consequential relationship between the Health Belief Model constructs and health behaviour. Health education and health promotion can influence and guide the theory of health behaviour. Education programs and interventions are recommended because they are more likely to benefit employees and communities in their quest to change health behaviours.
. Gochman, D. S. (1997). Handbook of Health Behaviour Research. New York. Vol. 1-4.
. Stretcher, V.J., & Rosenstock, I.M. The Health Belief Model: In Health Behaviour and Health Education, ed. K. Glanz, F.M. Lewis, & B.K. Rimer. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1997.
. The Caribbean Public Health Agency (CARPHA): Situation Report – No. 36-April 22, 2020.
. Fisk, S. T. and Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognitive. London: McGraw-Hill.
. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Social cognition: From brains to culture. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
. Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The health belief model: A decade later. Health Education & Behaviour, 11, 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198 18401100101.
. Harrison JA, Mullen PD, Green L. A meta-analysis of the health belief model with adults. Health Education Research. 1992; 7(1):107–116.10.1093/her/7.1.107 [PubMed: 10148735].
. Abraham, C., & Sheeran, P. (2015). The health belief model. In M. Conner and P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting and changing health9 behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models (3rd Edn.; pp. 30-69). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
. Champion, V. L., & Skinner, C. S. (2008). The health belief model. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behaviour and health education: Theory, research, and practice (4th ed., pp. 45–65). San Fran- cisco: Jossey-Bass.
. Hochbaum, G., Rosenstock, I., & Kegels, S. (2016). The Health Belief Model. Washington, DC: U.S. Public Health Service. (Original work published 1952).
. Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K. & Lewis, F. M. (2002). Health behaviour and health education: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
. Hochbaum, G. M. (1958). Public participation in medical screening programs: A socio-psychological study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Bureau of State Services, Division of Special Health Services, Tuberculosis Program.
. Hayden, J. (2013). Introduction to health behaviour theory (2nd Ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlet.
. Thweatt, T., & Query, J. (2005). Health belief model. In R. Heath (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of public relations (pp. 383–386). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952545.n1939.
. Rogers, A. Adult Learning for Development. Cassell, London, 1992.
. Parkerson, G., et al (1993). “Disease-Specific Versus Generic Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life in Insulin-Dependent Diabetic Patients.” Medical Care, 1993, 31, 629-637.
. Simonds, S. "Health Education in the Mid-1970s: State of the Art." In Preventive Medicine USA. New York: Prodist, 1976.
. Kasl, S.V., and Cobb, S. “Health Behaviour, Illness Behaviour, and Sick-Role Behaviour: I. Health and Illness Behaviour.” Archives of Environmental Health, 1966, 12, 246-266.
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- By submitting the processing fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.
- It should be clear for authors that the Editor In Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper. The Editor In Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor In Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 7 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor In Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he have the right to accept\reject the paper.B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s). C. the Editor In Chief himself evaluates the paper.
- Author will take the responsibility what so ever if any copyright infringement or any other violation of any law is done by publishing the research work by the author
- Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.
- If at any time, due to any legal reason, if the journal stops accepting manuscripts or could not publish already accepted manuscripts, we will have the right to cancel all or any one of the manuscripts without any compensation or returning back any kind of processing cost.
- The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.