Practicum Experiences of Prospective Teachers: The Inevitable Adaptation to Teaching Online
Keywords:prospective teachers, online teaching, mixed-method
Prospective teachers (students) in the Bachelor of Education (BEd.) programme at the University of Trinidad and Tobago, Year Three, would have been required to conduct ‘field’ practicum at various schools throughout the country, under normal circumstances. However, due to the pandemic and the closure of all schools, only online classes were conducted and adaptations had to be made to acclimatize to the situation. Prospective teachers were required to engage in teaching to their peers online, together with micro-teaching which complemented the process. Instructors as well as classmates and presenters engaged in critique, rigorous analysis, reflection and feedback. The sample included forty (40) full-time students, generally between the ages of 18 to 25, who had no previous classroom teaching experiences. A mixed-method approach was deemed as suitable to investigate how prospective teachers adapted to online teaching and learning to implement the content of the prescribed curriculum. Online questionnaires, focus group interviews, via Zoom and reflective writings were used to collect data. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were integrated for data analyses. The findings revealed that most prospective teachers were very proficient with the use of the Zoom platform and were very creative in their approaches for teaching using videos, online games, power point presentations and voice-overs. However, there were instances of major problems involving internet connectivity and instability, particularly for those who live in remote villages. In addition, some students preferred online-teaching, while others indicated a preference for a blended approach. The results have serious connotations for the health and well-being of students. Those who are constrained by a lack of internet feel disadvantaged, vulnerable and marginalized.
. Ministry of Education (2020). “National Consultation on Education”. 2020. Trinidad and Tobago.
. P. Ersin, D. Atay, & E. Mede, E. “Boosting Preservice Teachers’ Competence and Online Teaching Readiness through E-Practicum during the COVID-19 Outbreak.” International Journal of TESOL Studies (2020) Vol. 2 (2) 112-124, 2020 https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2020.09.09[
. L. Ramsook & M. Thomas. “Perspectives of prospective teachers on zoom as a transformative teaching methodology”. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research www.ijier.netVol:-7No-11, 2019
. C. Spanorriga, P. Tsiotakis, & A. Jimoyiannis. “E-mentoring and novice teachers’ professional development: Program design and critical success factors.” In T. Bastiaens, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World conference on educational media and technology Amsterdam, Netherlands: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 2018, pp.1315-1324, Boosting Preservice Teachers’ Competence and Online Teaching Readiness through E-Practicum during the COVID-19 Outbreak Pinar Ersin* Marmara University, Turkey Derin Atay Enisa Mede University and Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, we designed an alternative practice to meet the needs of PTs and maintain the quality of the practicum: “e-practicum” under the supervision of the university supervisor who acted as the “e-mentor”. The aim was to increase PTs’ teaching competence and prepare them for online teaching. A virtual classroom consisting of twenty-five PTs was formed and six PTs performed microteaching to their peers who acted as students by using Zoom. After the e-practicum sessions, peers gave detailed feedback to the teacher PTs. The university supervisor provided e-mentoring right after each session. Then, each teacher PT reflected on e-practicum experience and e-mentoring. The findings revealed that PTs found the e-practicum useful because it helped them overcome online teaching fears
. H. Beetham & R. Sharpe. “Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: designing and delivering e-learning”. New York, NY: Routledge, 2013.
. A. L. Cloete. “Technology and education: Challenges and opportunities. HTS Theological Studies, 73(4), 1-7., 2017 https://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hts.v73i4.4589
. V. C. X. Wang. “Traditional Teaching or Innovative Teaching via Technology?” Learning and Performance Quarterly, 2(1), 1-13, 2013.
. J. W. Creswell. “Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research” (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2012.
. R. B. Johnson, A.J. Onwuegbuzie & L. A. Turner. “Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research”. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112-133, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
. L. Cohen, L. Manion & K. Morrison. “Research methods in education”. New York, NY: Routledge., 2007.
. M. M. Archibal, R. C. Ambagtshee, M.G. Casey & M. Lawles (2019). “Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection: Perceptions and Experiences of Researchers and Participants” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, (1–8). 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1609406919874596
. M. B. Miles, M. A. Huberman & J. Saldana. “Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook” (3rd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 2014.
. J. W. Creswell, J. W., & V. L. Plano Clark. “Designing and conducting mixed methods research” (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publication, 2011.
. C. L. Scott. “The futures of learning 3: What kind of pedagogies for the 21st century?” UNESCO Education Research and Foresight, Paris. [ERF Working Papers Series, No. 15]. 2015.
. M. Prensky. “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon”. MCB University Press 9 (5) 1-6, 2001. Retrieved 26.9.11 from https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf
How to Cite
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.