The Ethnozoolgy: Traditional Knowledge and Animal Use by Osing Tribe in Banyuwangi, Indonesia

Authors

  • Budi Prasetyo Biology Study Program, FST, Open University, Cabe Raya Street, Pondok Cabe, Pamulang District, South Tangerang City, Banten Province, Indonesia, 15418

Keywords:

The ethnozoology, emic, unstructured interviews, economic value of animals

Abstract

The Osing tribal community has very strong characteristics, especially consistency, order, and obedience to carry out and preserve the traditions and cultural heritage of their ancestors, in the midst of modern social conditions and sophisticated information technology. However, in supporting a healthy and hygienic daily routine, they also consider the importance of the need for animal protein in addition to vegetable protein because most of them work as farmers who rely on physical energy to carry out their activities.  The research aims to reveal the traditional knowledge of the Osing people about the wealth, role, and benefits of animals that live in their environment, as well as the economic value of domesticated animals for their welfare. The research uses an exploratory method based on an emic approach, besides that data collection is also carried out through unstructured interviews, and data analysis using cross-checking, summarizing and synthesizing methods. The results showed that the number of animal species richness known by the Osing community was 91 species from 66 families and 12 classes. All of these animals have roles and benefits for the lives of the Osing people as follows: 1) basic intake of animal protein, 2) cultivated plant pests, 3) the need for pleasure, 4) traditional medicinal ingredients, 5) traditional ritual purposes, 6) animal predators livestock, and 7) decomposer organic matter. The economic value of the 4 animal species that have been domesticated to meet the subsistence needs of the Osing people is IDR 2,252,610,000/head of family/year or IDR 187,717,500/head of family/month.

References

L.M. Johnson, “Ethnobiology: Traditional Biological Knowledge in Contemporary Global Context.” Athabasca Univ. Pr, 2002.

R. Ellen, “The Cultural Relations of Classification, an Analysis of Nuaulu Animal Categories from Central Seram.” Cambridge: Cambridge Univ, 1993.

B. Meehan, “Shell Bed to Shell Midden.” Canberra: Australian Institute Of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra, 1982.

E.S. Hunn, “Ethnozoology.” E.N. Anderson, M.P. Deborah, S.H. Eugene, and J.T. Nancy (Ed.) Hoboken, New Jersey. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2011.

B. Prasetyo, T. Chikmawati, E.B. Walujo, and E. Amzu, “Ethnoecology: The traditional landscape of Osing Tribe in Banyuwangi, Indonesia.” Biodiversitas 19(6): 2003-2009, 2018.

B. Prasetyo, “Etnobiologi masyarakat suku Osing di Kabupaten Banyuwangi.” Disertasi. Bogor. Departemen Biologi Tumbuhan, Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor, 2019.

M. Rosa and D.C. Orey, “The field of research in ethnomodeling: emic, ethic and dialectical approaches.” Educ Pesqul Sao Paulo 38(4): 865-879, 2012.

Ajd.R. Silva and Ld.H.C. Andrade, “Cultural signifi¬cance of plants in communities located in the coastal for¬est zone of the State of Pernambuco, Brazil.” Human Ecol¬ogy 34: 447-465, 2006.

F. Vodouhe, O. Coulibaly, A.Adegbidi, and B. Sinsin, “Community perception of biodiversity conservation within protected areas in Benin.” Forest Pol & Econ. 12: 505-512, 2010.

T.H.White Jr., A.J. Camacho, T. Bloom, P.L. Diéguez, and R. Sellares, “Human perceptions regarding endangered species conservation: a case study of Saona Island, Dominican Republic.” Latin American Journal of Conservation 2(1): 18-29, 2011.

H.R. Bernard, “Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative methods 3rd edition.” AltaMira Press,Walnut Creek, California, 2002.

J.L. Lewis and S.R.J. Sheppard, “Culture and com¬munication: can landscape visualization improve forest management consultation with indigenous communities?.” Landscape and Urban Planning 77: 291–313, 2006.

H. Newing, C.M. Eagle, R.K. Puri, and C.W. Watson, “Conducting Research in Conservation: Social science methods and practice.” Routledge, London and New York. ISBN: 9780415457927, 2011.

T. Whitten, R.E. Soeriaatmadja, and S.A. Afiff, “Ekologi Jawa dan Bali.” Jakarta. Prenhallindo, 1999.

Apriari Beekeeping Center of Pramuka, “A Little Information and Benefits of Honey, Bee Pollen, Royal Jelly.” Jakarta: Pusat Perlebahan Apriari Pramuka, 2002.

Inayah, A. Marianti, and Lisdiana, “Efek madu randu dan kelengkeng dama menurunkan kolesterol pada tikus putih hiperkolesterolemik.” Unnes J Life Sci. 1(1): 8-12, 2012.

S. Bogdanov, T. Jurendic, R. Sieber, and R. Gallmann, “Honey for nutrition and health: a Review.” Amer J Coll Nutri. 27: 677-689, 2008.

Y. Purwanto, R. Saparita, and E. Munawaroh, “Keanekaragaman Jenis Hasil Hutan Nonkayu Berpotensi Ekonomi dan Cara Pengembangannya di Kabupaten Malinau.” Bogor: LIPI Pr, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-17

How to Cite

Budi Prasetyo. (2021). The Ethnozoolgy: Traditional Knowledge and Animal Use by Osing Tribe in Banyuwangi, Indonesia. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 60(5), 142–157. Retrieved from https://www.gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/12927

Issue

Section

Articles