An Assessment on the Perception and Practices of Instructors and Engineering Students towards Teaching and Learning Technical Report Writing and Research Methodology: Three Public Universities of the Country in Focus
AbstractThe purpose of the study was to assess the perception and practices of instructors and engineering students towards teaching and learning the course scientific technical report writing and research methodology. The study particularly, investigate motivational methods do instructors use to mobilize engineering students’ towards learning the course scientific technical report writing skill, examine how engineering students perceive importance of the course, assess the extent to which engineering students were eager to make active engagement inside and outside the classroom, and identify the influencing factors that demotivate instructors and engineering students towards teaching and learning the course.To accomplish this purpose, the study employed a descriptive survey method, which is supplemented by quantitative and qualitative research method to enrich data. The study was carried out in three public universities in the country purposively. Questionnaire and interview was the main instrument utilized during data collection. Descriptive statistics like frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation for quantitative part and narration for qualitative part were employed to analyze data. The findings of the study revealed that learning the course scientific technical report writing skills would enable the students to be competent in the skills like: writing CVs, office memos, minutes of formal meetings, technical report, executive summary, multidisciplinary projects, job application letters, and writing research proposal. Moreover, the findings of the study indicated that less attention given to the course by some respective departments and students, large class size, inconsistency of time or period allocation to the course and lack of reference materials on the course are some negative influencing factors or challenges instructors faced while teaching scientific technical report writing skills. Finally recommendations were drawn based on the above findings. Hence, engineering students need to be competent enough in scientific technical report writing skills like writing CVs, office memos, minutes of formal meetings, executive summary, projects, and job application letters. Likewise, department heads and faculty deans should give attention to the course scientific technical report writing skills to better benefit engineering students from the course.
Gupta, D. & Getachew Seyoum. The influence of motivation and attitude on writing strategy use of undergraduate students: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives, 2011.
Gerson S. & Steven M. “Technical Writing: Process and Product” fifth edition, Second Impression, 2008.
Cotterall, S. Readiness for autonomy: Investigating learner beliefs. System, 1995.
Teitelbaum, H. How to write thesis or/and project, Monarch Press, New York, 1975.
Mantle-Bromley, C. Positive attitudes and realistic beliefs: Links to Proficiency, 1995.
Tarpley, M. Project/Paper Writing Guide, Baptist Press (Nig.) Limited, Ibadan, 1978.
Oni, K.C. Research reporting: A guide to thesis preparation for Agricultural Engineers, Department of Agricultural Engineering, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria, March. 1995.
Olorunmaiye, J. A guide for writing final year project report, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria, 1999.
Shortall, T. Distinctions and Dichotomies: Artificial and Authentic. English Teaching Professional, 2001.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- By submitting the processing fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.
- It should be clear for authors that the Editor In Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper. The Editor In Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor In Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 7 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor In Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he have the right to accept\reject the paper.B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s). C. the Editor In Chief himself evaluates the paper.
- Author will take the responsibility what so ever if any copyright infringement or any other violation of any law is done by publishing the research work by the author
- Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.
- If at any time, due to any legal reason, if the journal stops accepting manuscripts or could not publish already accepted manuscripts, we will have the right to cancel all or any one of the manuscripts without any compensation or returning back any kind of processing cost.
- The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.