Development Learning Device Based for Measuring Contextual Critical Thinking Skills Students SD Class VI Mathematical
Keywords:
Learning Tool, contextual, Critical Thinking Mathematically, Students Elementary.Abstract
Development research aims to generate a contextual based learning tools valid and practical to measure mathematical critical thinking skills of elementary school students, and knowing its potential effect on the ability of critical thinking mathematically SD Class VI 050611 Aman Damai student. Development of a model learning device refers Tessmer which consists of three stages: self evaluation, prototyping,and field test. Data collection was conducted by observation, documentation, and test. From the results of this development acquired learning device (lesson plans, worksheets and tests) material Volume Prisms Triangle and tube-based contextual that can be considered valid and practical, as well as having a potential effect in measuring critical thinking ability of students' mathematical which has not grown and familiarized.
References
Adler, J. 2000. Social practice theory and mathematics teacher education: A conversation between theory andpractice.Nordic Journal of Mathematics Education, 8 (3), 31-53.
Akker, JV 1999. Design Approaches and Tools in Education andTraining.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Clark, K., & Borko, H. (2004). Establishing a professional learning community among middle school mathematicsteachers.In MJ Hoines and A. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 223-230). Bergen, Norway: Bergen University College.
Mone. 2007. Material Socialization and Education Unit Level Training Curriculum (SBC) SMP. Jakarta: Ministry of National Education Curriculum Center.
Doppelt, Y. 2003. Implementation and Assessment of Project Based Learning in a Flexible Environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 13255-272
Ennis, Robert H. 1995. CriticalThinking.New Jersey: Prentice Hall, University of Illinois.
Facione, Peter A. 2010. Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why ItCounts.[Online] Available:http://www.telacommunications.com/nutshell/cthinking.htm
Franke, ML, Carpenter, TP, Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers' generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 653-689.
Henningsen, M. & Stein, MK1997."Mathematical and student cognition: Based Classroom Support and Inhibit that High Level Mathematical Thinking And Reasoning".Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 524-549.
Innabi, Hanan. 2003. Aspects of Critical Thinking in Classroom Instruction of Secondary School Mathematics Teachers inJordan.[Online] Available: http://dipmat.math.unipa.it/pdf.
Johnson, Elaine B. 2010. Contextual Teaching & Learning: Making Activity Teaching and Learning Exciting and Meaningful.Bandung: Kaifa.
Muslich, Masnur.2007. SBCCompetency-Based Learning andContextual.Jakarta: Earth Literacy.
Nasoetion, N. 2007. Evaluation of LearningMathematics.Jakarta: The Open University.
Nur, M. 2000. Application of Contextual Learning in Mathematics Subjects.Yogyakarta: PPPG Mathematics.
Nurhadi. 2002. Contextual Approach. Jakarta: Ministry of Education.
Santrock, John W. 2007. Child Development.Jakarta: Erland.
Shigeo, K. 2000. "On Teaching Mathematical Thinking". In 0 Toshio (Ed.) Mathematical Education in Japan (PP. 26-28). Japan: (JSME)
Shimizu, N. 2000. "An Analysis of 'Make an Organized List' Strategy in Problem Solving Process". In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds). Proceedings of the 2LH Conference of The International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 4 (PP. 145-152). Hiroshima: Hiroshima University
Solso, RL, Maclin, OH, and Maclin, MK 2008. CognitivePsychology.Jakarta: publisher.
Somakim. 2010. Upgrades Critical Thinking and Self-Efficacy Mathematics Junior High School students with the use of Realistic Mathematics Approach. Bandung: PPS UPI. Unpublished dissertation.
Tessmer, Martin. 1993. Planning and Conducting FormativeEvaluation.London, Philadelphia: Kogan Page
Yamada, A. 2000."TwoPaterus of Problem Solving Process from a Representational Perspective". In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.) Proceedings ofthe 24th Conference ofthe International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 4 (289-296). Hiroshima: Hiroshima University.
Zulkardi. 2006. Formative Evaluation: What, Why, When, andHow.[On line]. Available: http://www.geocities.com/zulkardi/books.html.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.
