A Comparative Study of Model to Support Teachers
Keywords:
assessment for learning, professional development, comparative study.Abstract
According to the assessment of educational reform efforts over the ten-year period from 18 August 1999 when the National Education Act of B.E. 2542 (1999 A.D.) was announced to the present, many issues were found successful while other topics have encountered problems requiring development, modification and continuation, especially in terms of student, teacher, faculty and educational personnel quality, management efficiency, including increases in educational opportunities. The purpose of this research was to comparative study about the developing teachers in terms of assessment for learning by studying Thailand and New Zealand context. The results founded those recommendations to the relevant authorities to create strategic approaches to develop models for promoting teachers in terms of assessment for learning in Thailand including of some issues surrounded by professional learning on assessment for learning in Thailand.
References
W. Srisa-arn. 2009. Special lectures at the Symposium "Strategies for solving problems and improving the quality of education" At Chulabhorn Research Institute, Laksi Bangkok. [June 18 2009]
Office of the Education Council, Ministry of Education. 2009. Educational Reform Proposals In the second decade (2009 -2018). Bangkok: Prikwan Graphic.
Office of the Education Council, Ministry of Education. 2011. Report on the results of the second decade of education reform driven (2009-2011). Bangkok: Prikwan Graphic.
P. Black and D. William. 2001. Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. BERA Short Final Draft. [Online]. Available: http://weaeducation.typepad.co.uk/files/blackbox-1.pdf [August 16, 2016]
O. Naiyapat. 2010. Classroom Assessment: Evolution and New Concepts to Improve Learning Journal of Srinakharinwirot University Research and Development (Humanities and Social Sciences). 2(3), pp. 1-12.
R. J. Stiggins. 2002. Assessment Crisis: The Absence of Assessment for Learning. Phi Delta Kappan. 83(10), pp. 758-765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208301010
OECD (2014a), Education at a Glance 2014: OECD Indicators, OECD. Publishing, Paris, . [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2014-en. [August 20, 2016]
P. Musset. 2010.
G. Z. F. Bereday. 1964. Comparative Method in Education. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
A. Cleesuntorn. 2015.
Office of the National Education Commission. (2003). National Education Act B.E. 2542 (1999). [Online]. Available: http://www.onesqa.or.th/en/publication/nation_edbook.pdf. [August 1, 2016]
G. W. Fry. And H. Bi. 2013 "The evolution of educational reform in Thailand: the Thai educational paradox", Journal of Educational Administration, 51(3), pp.290-319. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311311483 [August 10, 2016]
OECD/UNESCO. 2016. Education in Thailand: An OECD-UNESCO Perspective, Reviews of National Policies for Education, OECD Publishing, Paris. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264259119-en [August 9, 2016]
UNESCO BANGKOK. 2008. UNESCO publications: Asia-Pacific. Bangkok: UNESCO Bangkok. 2008. pp.54. [Online]. Available: www.unescobkk.org/elib/publications/268_269IKM [August 9, 2016]
New Zealand Ministry of Education. 2011. OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes: Country Background Report for New Zealand. [Online]. Available: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/6/16/47797042.pdf. [September 1, 2016]
New Zealand Ministry of Education. 2007. Improving School Leadership: Country Background Report New Zealand. [Online]. Available: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/37/43/38740175.pdf. [September 10, 2016]
R. Stiggins. (2005).
Iowa Department of Education. (2017). Formative Assessment. [Online]. Available: https://www.educateiowa.gov/pk-12/student-assessment/formative-assessment#Connections [August 1, 2016]
D. Wiliam. (2013 December).
OECD/UNESCO. 2016. Education in Thailand: An OECD-UNESCO Perspective, Reviews of National Policies for Education. OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264259119-en
OECD (2013), PISA 2012 Results: What Makes Schools Successful (Volume 4): Resources, Policies and Practices, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201156-en. [August 11, 2016]
K. Tangdhanakanond and S. Wongwanich. 2012.
M. Barber and M. Mourshed. 2007. How the World
D. Boyd, D. Goldhaber, H. Lankford and J. Wyckoff. 2007.
OECD. 2014b. TALIS 2013 Results: An International Perspective on Teaching and Learning. TALIS, OECD Publishing. Paris, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264196261-en. [November 16, 2016]
A. Schleicher. 2012.
P. Santiago and F. Benavides. 2009.
OECD. 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.
