Differences Ability of Visual Thinking Representation Mathematic and Student Learning Independence Between Student Who are Given an Open Ended Approach and Jigsaw Type Cooperative Model MTS Lab UIN SU Medan
Keywords:
Open-Ended Approach, Jigsaw Type Cooperative Model, Ability of Visual Thinking Representation, Student Learning Independence.Abstract
The purpose of this research is (1) To know the difference of visual thinking ability between students who are given open-ended learning with students who are given cooperative learning jigsaw type (2) To know the difference of learning independence between students who are given open-ended learning with students who are given Jigsaw type cooperative learning. This type of research is quasi experiment. The population of this research is all students of class VII of MTsS Laboratory of UIN SU Medan. The sample of this research is, Class VII-1 (37 students) taught by Jigsaw Cooperative type and VII-2 class (37 students) taught with Open Ended Approach. The instrument used consisted of the test of visual thinking representation ability and student self study independence questionnaire. Analysis performed using ANAVA.
The results showed that: (1) There is a significant influence on visual thinking ability of students were taught by given open-ended learning with students who are given cooperative learning jigsaw type. (2) There is a significant influence of student were taught learning independence between students who are given open-ended learning with students who are given Jigsaw type cooperative learning.
References
Assagaf, G. 2014. Pengaruh Kemandirian Belajar dan regulasi diri terhadap hasil belajar matematika melalui motivasi berprestasi pada siswa kelas X SMA Negeri di kota Ambon. Tesis. Tidak diterbitkan. Makassar: Universitas Negeri Makassar (UNM).
Cunningham, S. (2005). Visualization in science education. In Inven-tion and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education (pp. 127-128). Washington, DC: AAAS Press. Gardner, H. Five Minds for the Future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Fahradina, N. Et al. (2014). Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa SMP dengan Menggunakan Model Investigasi Kelompok. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika.Vol 1 No 1, September 2014
Lie, Anita (2004). Cooperative Learning. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
NCTM.(2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM
Nurhayati, Eti .2011. Psikologi Pendidikan inovatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Pintrich, P.R. 2000. The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning. In M.Boekaerts, P.R.Pintrich & M.Zeidner (Eds), Handbook of Self- Regulation(pp. 451-502) San Diego, CA: Academic.
Rosken, B..& Rolka.K.2006. A Picture is worth A 1000 words. The role of visualization in learning mathematics. Proceeding 30th conference of the interational group for the psychology of mathematics education. Vol 4 PP 457-464 Progue: PME
Schunk. D.H. 2005. Self Regulated Learning: The Educational Legacy of Paul R.Pintrich. In Educational Psychologist, 40 (2), 85-94
Shimada, S. (1997). The Significance of an Open Ended Approach. In Shimada, S. dan Becker, J.P. (Ed). The Open Ended Approach. A New Proposal for Teaching Mathematics. Reston: VA NCTM.
Silver, E.A.1994. On Mathematical Problem Posing.
Sumarmo, U.(2002). Alternatif Pembelajaran Matematika dalam Menerapkan Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Makalah pada Seminar Tingkat Nasional FMIPA UPI Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.
Walker, Caren M (2011). Visual Thinking: Art Students Have an Advantage in Geometric Reasoning.Scientific Research: USA. Vol. 2, No. 1, 22-26
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.
