Survey for Determining the Current Status of Grammar Instruction in Foreign Language Teaching in the Republic of Macedonia

Authors

  • Vesna Koceva Goce Delchev University, Krste Misirkov bb, 2000 Shtip, Macedonia

Keywords:

attitudes, foreign language, grammar, grammar teaching.

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to gain insights into the students’ opinions, attitudes and suggestions in regard to grammar instruction in the learning and teaching of foreign languages. Furthermore, the paper explores and provides an overview of the current practices language teachers employ in order to present grammar rules in the foreign language classrooms in the Republic of Macedonia. The survey data was collected through a questionnaire administered primarily in the Faculty of Philology at the University Goce Delchev in Shtip. A total of 224 undergraduate students enrolled in their first semester participated in the survey from 2012 to 2016. The data analysis reveals students’ prior experiences, attitudes, and concerns related to the role and importance of grammar in foreign language teaching as well as students’ perceptions of the usefulness of grammar learning and its impact on the overall mastery of the language.

References

S. Krashen & T. Terrell. The natural approach. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1983.

W. E. Rutherford & M. Sharwood Smith. “Consciousness and universal grammar”. Applied Linguistics, vol. 6 (3), pp. 274-283, 1985.

T. V. Higgs. “Curriculum, competence and foreign language teacher”. The ACTFL Foreign Language Education Series, vol.13, Skokie Ill.: National Textbook Company, 1982.

R. Ellis. Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.

M. Celce-Murcia. “Grammar pedagogy in second and foreign language teaching”. TESOL Quarterly, vol. 25 (3), pp. 459-480, 1991.

P. Lightbown & N. Spada. “Focus on form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning”. SSLA, vol.12 (4), pp. 429-448, 1990.

C. Doughty. “Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study on SL relativization”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 13, pp. 431-469, 1991.

H. Nassaji & S. Fotos. “Current developments in research on the teaching of grammar.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, vol. 24, pp. 126-145, 2004.

R. Ellis. Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Learning in the classroom. Oxford/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1990.

R. Ellis. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.

R. Ellis. “Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 24, pp. 223-236, 2002.

D. Larsen-Freeman & M. Long. An introduction to second language acquisition research. New York: Longman, 1991.

C. Doughty & E. Varela. “Communicative Focus on Form,” in Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, C. Doughty & J. Williams, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 114-138.

R. Ellis. “The place of grammar instruction in the Second/Foreign Language Curriculum.” in New Perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms, E. Hinkel & S. Fotos, Ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002, pp. 17-33.

R. Ellis. Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

P. Robinson. Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-24

How to Cite

Koceva, V. (2017). Survey for Determining the Current Status of Grammar Instruction in Foreign Language Teaching in the Republic of Macedonia. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 36(6), 213–225. Retrieved from https://www.gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/8366

Issue

Section

Articles