For the Future: Sustainable Wildlife Reserve Management in Turkey

Authors

  • Ahmet Arpacık Depertmant of Wildlife Ecology and Management, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
  • Alptuğ Sari Depertmant of Wildlife Ecology and Management, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
  • Şağdan Başkaya Depertmant of Wildlife Ecology and Management, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey

Keywords:

wildlife reserve area, wildlife management, management plan, Turkey.

Abstract

Wildlife management is particularly necessary in today’s world. In recent years, various groups and many individuals interested in the management of wildlife resources have recognized a need for reform in wildlife resources and management. Nowadays, sustainable management of wildlife is one of the most popular topics in every country. Sustainable wildlife management is an essential tool to conserve certain biodiversity and is vital for maintaining and enhancing ecosystem services. Wildlife areas are the important biodiversity areas of Turkey, and they host many endangered plant and animal species. The fact that these important wildlife areas can’t be managed properly will cause important problems not only for Turkey but also for World biodiversity. In this study, it was aimed to examine the main problems of wildlife resource management in Turkey and to provide solution suggestions. The most important problem in wildlife areas is the lack of qualified wildlife personnel; in other words, the inappropriate management of wildlife resources. Besides that, the ineffective legislation and organization, lack of qualified guarding teams, inability of preventing poaching, non-scientifically planned areas, non-scientific limitation on wildlife reserve, identification of unsuitable areas for target species, residential areas, agricultural lands, grazing activities, forestry activities, predators, stray dogs, and the lack of inventory and recording system are the other important problems of wildlife resource management.

References

FAO, 2014. Sustainable Wildlife Management And Biodiversity, Fact Sheet.

Adams, L. W, and Dove, L. E. 1989. Wildlife Reserve and Corridors in the Urban Environment; A Guide to ecological Landscape Planning and Resource Conservation. National Institute for Urban Wildlife 10921 Trotting Ridge way Columbia, Maryland 21044.

Bolen, E. G., and Robinson, W. L. 1995. Wildlife Ecology and Management, Fourth Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Serneels, S., Said, M. Y., Lambin, E. F. 2001. Land Cover Changes Around a Major East African wildlife Reserve: The Mara Ecosystem (Kenya), International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22, 17, 3397-3420.

Limbu, K. P., and Karki, T. B. 2003. Park–people Conflict in Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Our Nature, 1, 15-18.

Riley, L., Riley, W. 2005. Nature's Strongholds: The World's Great Wildlife Reserves, Princeton University Press.

Shrestha, R. K., Alavalapatı, R. R. 2006. Linking Conservation and Development: An Analysis of Local People’s Attitude Towards Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 8, 69–84.

Juffe-Bignoli, D., Burgess, N. D., Bingham, H., Belle, E. M. S., de Lima, M. G., Deguignet M, Bertzky B, Milam A N, Martinez-Lopez J, Lewis E, Eassom A, Wicander S, Geldmann, J., van Soesbergen, A., Arnell, A. P., O’Connor, B., Park, S., Shi, Y. N., Danks, F. S., MacSharry, B., Kingston, N. 2014. Protected Planet Report 2014. UNEP-WCMC: Cambridge, UK.

Bhola, N., Juffe-Bignoli, D., Burgess, N., Sandwith, T., Kingston, N. (2016). Protected Planet Report 2016, UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, Cambridge UK and Gland, Switzerland.

General Directorate of Nature Protection and National Parks, 2013. Partners Available at: http://www.milliparklar.gov.tr/kitap/77/AV_YABAN_ING.pdf (accessed 14Aug 2017).

Oğurlu, İ . 2009. About wildlife resources management. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 2 (0), 35-88. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/tjf/issue/20891/224299

Anonymous, 2012. Wildlife Management and Development Plans (2008 – 2012) (Dim Çayı, Çoruh Vadisi, Hançer Deresi, Verçenik Dağı, Sivridağ, Aladağlar, Karanfil Dağı, Demirkazık, Posof, Emremsultan, Yedigöller-Yeşilöz, Cehennemderesi, Üzümdere, Azdavay, Köyceğiz, Düzlerçamı, Kığı Şeytan Dağları, Çat, Kuluca, Sarıkamış –Kağızman) Republic Of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Forestry, General Directorate of Environmental Protection and National Parks, Ankara.

Başkaya, Ş and Başkaya, E. 2012. The Position And The Importance Of Wildlife Undergraduate Education On Environmental Protection In Turkey, Journal Of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 13, 2026-2034.

Arpacik, A. 2012. Management and Development Plans in Wildlife Reserve Areas in Turkey. Master Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, Trabzon.

Shaw, W. W. 2000 Graduate Education in Wildlife Management: Major Trends and Opportunities to Serve Int. Students. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28 (3), 514.

Weladji, R. B., Moe, S. R. and Vedeld P. 2003. Stakeholder attitudes towards wildlife policy and the Bénoué Wildlife Conservation Area, North Cameroon. Environmental Conservation 30 (4): 334–343.

Ministry of Water Affairs and Forestry, 2015. Partners Available at: http://www.ormansu.gov.tr/osb/ (accessed 7 April 2017).

Downloads

Published

2017-11-30

How to Cite

Arpacık, A., Sari, A., & Başkaya, Şağdan. (2017). For the Future: Sustainable Wildlife Reserve Management in Turkey. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 36(6), 250–261. Retrieved from https://www.gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/8401

Issue

Section

Articles