Drop Out of Family Planning Acceptors Based on Contraceptive Methods in Rural and Urban Areas
Abstract
The rate of family planning drop out in 2012are pills (38,8%), condom (38,3%), injection(23%), IUD (9,9%) and implant(5,7%) while in 2013 are pills(41%), condom(31%), injection(25%), IUD (6%), and implant (8%). Changing method data is 13% and the highest used methods are pills and condom. The data of drop out is unavailable by name and by address. Moreover, there is no specific data of drop out both in province level and regency. Drop out is related to TFR (Total Fertility Rate) in which if there are many reproductive-aged couples, there will be many pregnancy possibility and if the level of birth is high, there will be a high rate of TFR. The study aimed to know the contraveptive methods used in rural and urban areas which cause family planning acceptors’ drop out.The study was a descriptive design. The population of the study were family planning acceptors drop out based on the contraceptive methods. The samples of the study were 100 people drawn by closed and opened questionnaire and were presented in a descriptive form. The Result of this study showed contraceptive method which mostly have been used by acceptors is injective method with 44%. There is no significant difference between Bantul regency as the represenattion of urban areas and Gunung Kidul regency as the representation of rural areas in which most of the respondents use injective method. The usage of injective method in urban areas is 20% and 22% in rural areas.
References
Menteri Perencanaaan Pembangunan Nasional, Kepala Badan Perencanaan Pembagunan Nasional. Laporan pencapaian tujuan pembangunan milenium di Indonesia 2010. Jakarta: Kementerian Perencanaaan Pembangunan Nasional, Badan Perencanaan Pembagunan Nasional; 2010.
Witjaksono, dr. Julianto. Deputi Kepala Bidang KB dan KR Konsultasi Kepala Seksi BKKBN. Rencana Aksi Keluarga Berencana dan Kesehatan Reproduksi tahun 2012-2014. Jakarta
World Health Organization. Decision-making tool for family planning clients and providers technical adaptation guide. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/Center for Communication Programs; 2013.
Badan Pusat Statistik Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. 2011. Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta in Figure. Yogyakarta.
Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional. Rakernas pembangunan kependudukan dan KB tahun 2012. Jakarta: Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional; 2013.
Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional. Evaluasi pelaksanaan program kependudukandan KB tahun 2012. Jakarta: Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional; 2013.
Musdalifah, Hanis. 2013. Faktor yang Berhubungan Dengan Droup out Pada Akseptor KB di Kecamatan Labakkang. Jurnal Stikes Nani Hasanuddin volume 3 no 4 tahun 2013.
Handayani, L.Suharmiati Hariastuti, dan Latifah. 2012. Peningkatan Informasi tentang KB ; Hak Reproduksi yang Perlu Diperhatikan oleh Program Pelayanan Keluarga Berencana. Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan Vol 15 no 3. Penelitian Pusat Humaiora Kebijakan Kesehatan dan pemberdayaan Masyaraka, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Kementrin Kesehatan RI.
Saifuddin, A, B. (2006). Buku panduan praktis pelayanan kontrasepsi. Jakarta: YBP Sarwono.
Glasier Ana, Alisa Gabbie. 2006. Keluarga Berencana dan Kesehatan Reproduksi. EGC. Jakarta
Hodson P, Seber P. A woman’s right to choose counselling. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 2009; 28(4): 174-5.
Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2013. Situasi Keluarga Berencana di Indonesia. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.
Alkema, L., Kantorova, V., Menozzi, C., & Biddlecom, A. (2013). National, regional, and global rates and trends in contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning between 1990 and 2015: a systematic and comprehensive analysis. Lancet, 381(9878), 1642-1652. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62204-1
Austin, A. (2015). Unmet contraceptive need among married Nigerian women: an examination of trends and drivers. Contraception, 91(1), 31-38. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2014.10.002
Machiyama, K., Casterline, J. B., Mumah, J. N., Huda, F. A., Obare, F., Odwe, G., . . . Cleland, J. (2017). Reasons for unmet need for family planning, with attention to the measurement of fertility preferences: protocol for a multi-site cohort study. Reprod Health, 14(1), 23. doi:10.1186/s12978-016-0268-z
Arikunto, Suharsini. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Rineka Cipta
Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional. Evaluasi pelaksanaan program kependudukandan KB tahun 2012. Jakarta: Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional; 2013.
Badan Pusat Statistik, BKKBN, Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, USAID. Laporan pendahuluan, survei demografi dan kesehatan Indonesia 2012. Calverton, Maryland, USA. Indonesia: BPS dan Macro International; 2012.
Hodson P, Seber P. A woman’s right to choose counselling. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 2009; 28(4): 174-5.
Moelong,L.J. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosda Karya : Bandung
Notoatmodjo. 2007. Promosi Kesehatan dan Ilmu Perilaku. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta
Padget, D.K. 2012. Qualitative and Mixed Methods in Public Helalth. London : Sage Publication Asia Pacific Pte. Ldt
Sugiyono, 2009. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung : CV. Alfa Beta
Sulaiman. 2015. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Campuran.Surakarta : UNS Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.
