Technology Transfer in Biorefinery Development: A Discourse Analytic Approach
Keywords:
technology transfer, government, public research institutes, discourse analysis.Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to get the magnitude of parameter on internal and external factor of technology transfer process in biorefinery. The microscale process of technology development open the opportunity to get comprehensive vision in implementing advance technology. This investigation which cover in micro level of technology transfer process would be enriched by provision of useful insights on stakeholders on application of Biorefinery technology. The scope of research was included nation scale. This research covered of transferring technology from public funded institution as the technology provider. In this investigation, the internal and external factor of biorefinery were developed which based on observation, interview and text that enriched by literature review and main theoretical framework. This research contributes to the knowledge of innovation management in particular on technology transfer process which provides empirically description of identification of essential factor of technology transfer. It shows dynamics environment that influence the capacity of technology transfer and the role of each factor. The result of this research are able to enrich the knowledge of policy maker related to innovation process as it embraces appropriate concept and theory of technology transfer in similar type of advance technology. It is unlikely suggest to either structural changing or structural upgrading, however it shows new element that have not been touch by the government. To capture to this objective as innovation strategy, this paper enhances the understanding of innovation as endogenous aspect of economic development and influenced by exogenous forces.
Earlier research has identified the flow and stage of technology transfer from provider to user in the system, this paper outlines the platform as powerful role in policy making
References
H. Mintzberg, B. Ahlstrand, and J. Lampel, “Strategy Safari,” Free Press, p. 406, 1998.
L. Shapley and A. Roth, “Stable matching: Theory, evidence, and practical design.,” Nobel, p. 5 pp., 2012.
A. E. Roth and E. Peranson, “The redesign of the matching market for american physicians: Some engineering aspects of economic design,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 748–780, 1999.
S. Robinson, “Innovation Diffusion and Technology Transfer,” pp. 1–12, 2009.
J. Tidd and J. Bessant, “Managing Innovation,” p. 642, 2009.
L. V. Shavinina, Handbook on Innovation. 2003.
C. H. Tzeng, “A review of contemporary innovation literature: A Schumpeterian perspective,” Innov. Manag. Policy Pract., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 373–394, 2009.
Jason Potts; Tim Kastelle, “P ublic sector innovation research : What ’ s next ?,” Innov. Manag. policy Pract., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 122–137, 2010.
G. Jones, “ECON7540 Economics of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Module 11,” Innovation.
J. Potts, “ECON7540 Economics of entrepreneurship and innovation,” pp. 1–17, 2008.
L. M. Branscomb, “From Science pol to Res Pol.pdf.” p. 34, 2003.
B. Bozeman, “Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory,” Res. Policy, vol. 29, no. 4–5, pp. 627–655, 2000.
Z. Fang, W. Han, and Y. Li, “Permission based Android security: Issues and countermeasures,” Comput. Secur., vol. 43, pp. 205–218, 2014.
J. P. Lane, “The State of the Science in Technology Transfer : Implications for the Field of Assistive Technology,” Rehabilitation, pp. 333–354, 2003.
D. Kapur, “Diasporas and Technology Transfer,” J. Hum. Dev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 265–286, 2001.
E. M. Rogers, “The Nature of Technology Transfer,” Sci. Commun., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 323–341, 2002.
B. Bozeman, “Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory,” Res. Policy, vol. 29, pp. 627–655, 2000.
A. Reisman and L. Zhao, “A taxonomy of technology transfer transaction types,” J. Technol. Transf., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 38–42, 1991.
J. D. Roessner and A. Wise, “Public Policy and Emerging Sources of Technology and Technical Information Available to Industry,” Policy Stud. J., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 349–358, 1994.
J. P. Lane, “Understanding Technology Transfer,” Assist. Technol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5–19, 1999.
R. Singh and A. D. Setiawan, “Biomass energy policies and strategies: Harvesting potential in India and Indonesia,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 22, pp. 332–345, 2013.
K. Schwab, “The World Economic Forum,” World Economic Forum, 2015. .
C. Foyer, A. Kingston-smith, and C. Pollock, “S U C R O S E A N D I N V E R TA S E , A N U N E A S Y A L L I A N C E,” 1997.
J. H. Clark and F. E. I. Deswarte, “The Biorefinery Concept-An Integrated Approach,” in Introduction to Chemicals from Biomass, 2008, pp. 1–20.
M. Balat, “Production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic materials via the biochemical pathway: A review,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 52, no. 2. pp. 858–875, 2011.
Y. Chisti, “Biodiesel from microalgae beats bioethanol,” Trends Biotechnol., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 126–131, 2008.
F. Marton, “Phenomenography,” in The International Encyclopedia of Education, vol. 8, 1994, pp. 4424–4429.
I. Parker, “Introduction: Varieties of discourse and analysis,” in Critical textwork: An introduction to varieties of discourse and analysis, 1999, pp. 1–12.
L. A. Wood and R. O. Kroger, Doing discourse analysis. 2000.
M. Wetherell and J. Potter, “Discourse analysis and the identification of interpretative repertoires,” Anal. everyday Explan. A Caseb. methods, no. December, pp. 168–184, 1988.
J. K. Boyce, “FROM NATURAL RESOURCES TO NATURAL ASSETS*,” NEW Solut., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 267–288, 2001.
E. Aminullah, T. Fizzanty, K. Kusnandar, and R. Wijayanti, “Technology transfer through OFDI: The case of Indonesian natural resource-based MNEs,” Asian J. Technol. Innov., vol. 21, no. SUPPL1, pp. 104–118, 2013.
R. Jurowetzki and D. S. Hain, “Incremental by Design? On the Role of Incumbents in Technology Niches – An Evolutionary Network Analysis,” SSRN Electron. J., no. Aie, pp. 1–40, 2013.
S. Iammarino and P. McCann, “The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers,” Res. Policy, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1018–1036, 2006.
J. F. Tu, “Die and Mould Technology Transfer in the Environment of Industrial Cluster,” Appl. Mech. Mater., vol. 201–202, pp. 1029–1032, 2012.
S. Liu and P. Yu, “Knowledge flow in creative industrial cluster and C-SECI model,” in Proceedings - 2011 4th International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, ICIII 2011, 2011, vol. 2, pp. 230–233.
Y. L. Chyi, Y. M. Lai, and W. H. Liu, “Knowledge spillovers and firm performance in the high-technology industrial cluster,” Res. Policy, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 556–564, 2012.
M. Santoro and S. Gopalakrishnan, “Relationship dynamics between university research centers and industrial firms: Their impact on technology transfer activities,” J. Technol. Transf., vol. 26, pp. 163–171, 2001.
J. Yencken and M. A. Cantab, “Commercialising research through spin-off companies,” Direct, no. Autm 1999, 2002.
M. Dodgson, “Developing business from science - Institutions of science and intermediaries,” Fortune, 2006.
B. R. Martin and H. Etzkowitz, “The origin and evolution of the university species,” vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 9–34, 2000.
H. Etzkowitz, A. Webster, C. Gebhardt, B. Regina, and C. Terra, “The future of the university and the university of the future : evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm,” Sci. Technol., 2000.
K. S. Gallagher, A. Grübler, L. Kuhl, G. Nemet, and C. Wilson, “The Energy Technology Innovation System,” Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 137–162, 2012.
M. Dodgson, J. Mathews, T. Kastelle, and M. C. Hu, “The evolving nature of Taiwan’s national innovation system: The case of biotechnology innovation networks,” Res. Policy, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 430–445, 2008.
J. O. P. da Costa, S. Mendonça, and A. S. de Campos, “The Entrepreneurial State : debunking public vs . private sector miths (Mariana Mazzucato) - Resenha,” Revista Brasileira de Inovação, pp. 203–208, 2015.
R. Hawkins, “Marianna Mazzucato The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs Private Sector Myths,” Sci. Public Policy, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 143–145, 2015.
M. Mazzucato, “State of innovation,” New Sci., vol. 219, no. 2931, pp. 26–27, 2013.
S. Ganesan and J. Kelsey, “Technology transfer: international collaboration in Sri Lanka,” Constr. Manag. Econ., vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 743–753, 2006.
H. Etzkowitz and C. Zhou, “Regional innovation initiator: the entrepreneurial university in various triple helix models,” Singapore Triple Helix VI Conf. Theme Pap., no. July 2015, pp. 1–25, 2007.
H. Etzkowitz and C. Zhou, “Triple Helix,” Sci. Public Policy, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 77–83, 2006.
H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations,” Res. Policy, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 109–123, 2000.
L. Leydesdorff, “The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, ..., and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy?,” J. Knowl. Econ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 25–35, 2012.
L. Leydesdorff and M. Meyer, “The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations,” Scientometrics, vol. 58, no. 2. pp. 191–203, 2003.
H. Etzkowitz and M. Ranga, “A Triple Helix System for Knowledge-based Regional Development : From ‘ Spheres ’ to ‘ Spaces ,’” VIII Triple Helix Conf., pp. 1–29, 2010.
M. Ranga and H. Etzkowitz, “Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society,” Ind. High. Educ., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 237–262, 2013.
J. J. Bozell, “Feedstocks for the future - Biorefinery production of chemicals from renewable carbon,” Clean - Soil, Air, Water, vol. 36, no. 8. pp. 641–647, 2008.
J. Bell, M. Dodgson, L. Field, P. Gough, and T. Spurling, Translating research for economic and social benefit: country comparisons. 2015.
A. Reisman, “Transfer of technologies: A cross-disciplinary taxonomy,” Omega, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 189–202, 2005.
M. Mazzucato, “Financing innovation: Creative destruction vs. destructive creation,” Ind. Corp. Chang., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 851–867, 2013.
S. Dutta, B. Lanvin, and S. Wunsch-Vincent, The Global Innovation Index 2017. 2017.
Pusat Inovasi LIPI, “IP Port Pusat Inovasi,” 2017. [Online]. Available: http://inovasi.lipi.go.id/id/hki.
The Embassy of French, “Embassy of French in the US. The Office for Science and Technology,” 2015.
Kementerian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia, “Tugas dan Fungsi Kantor ATDIKBUD KBRI London,” pp. 6–8, 2010.
D. R. Benson and R. K. Kjelgren, “Tacit Diplomacy in Life Sciences: A Foundation for Science Diplomacy,” vol. 3, no. 1, 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.
