Health Impact Related to the Selection of Vasectomy as Male Contraceptive Method in Makassar City

Authors

  • A. M. Multazam Department of Public Health, Moslem University of Indonesia, Makassar

Keywords:

Vasectomy, Health, Male acceptor.

Abstract

Vasectomy method is still less desirable because  many causes, among others; religion, health, patriarchal culture, gender, costs, and social impacts that can occur.  This study aimed to review the health impact related to the selection of vasectomy as a male contraceptive method. It was a qualitative research with descriptive analysis approach which is carried out in three district (Mamajang, Tamalate dan Tamalanrea) in Makassar City. There were fifteen informants interviewed in this research who have become vasectomy acceptors for at least 1 (one) year. Data collection were carried through in-depth interview, observation, and documentation. The results shows that informants did not experience any health problems after becoming acceptor. Informants did not experience sexual dysfunction, there are even some informants who claims that their vitality is increasing after performing vasectomy procedure.Vasectomy did not have any negative health impact to those who performs the procedure. On the contrary, vasectomy has a positive health impact such as vitality increasing and can prevent the occurance of certain disease. This at once dismissed the negative issues that spread among society.

References

State Ministry for Population/ National Family Planning Coordinating Board, 2008. Grand Strategy to Increase Male Participation in Family Planning Programme, Jakarta.

Shattuck, D., et al., A Review of 10 Years of Vasectomy Programming and Research in Low- Resource Settings. Glob Health Sci Pract, 2016. 4(4): p. 647-660

McMullen, W.J. and J. Abourbih, Complications of vasectomy. Can Fam Physician, 1983. 29: p. 1335-7.

Ebeigbe, P.N., G.O. Igberase, and J. Eigbefoh, Vasectomy: a survey of attitudes, counseling patterns and acceptance among Nigerian resident gynaecologists. Ghana Med J, 2011. 45(3): p. 101-4.

Marvan, M.L., Y. Ehrenzweig, and D. Hernandez-Aguilera, Mexican Men's View of Vasectomy. Am J Mens Health, 2017. 11(3): p. 610-617.

Birgisson, N.E., et al., Preventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2015. 24(5): p. 349-53.

Tafese, F., M. Woldie, and B. Megerssa, Quality of family planning services in primary health centers of Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci, 2013. 23(3): p. 245-54.

Gavin, L., et al., Providing quality family planning services: Recommendations of CDC and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2014. 63(Rr-04): p. 1-54.

Turan, J.M., A. Bulut, and H. Nalbant, The quality of family planning services in two low-income districts of Istanbul. Nufusbil Derg, 1997. 19: p. 3-24.

Notoadmojo, Soekidjo. 2005. Education and Health Behavior, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-29

How to Cite

Multazam, A. M. (2018). Health Impact Related to the Selection of Vasectomy as Male Contraceptive Method in Makassar City. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 38(1), 244–248. Retrieved from https://www.gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/8879

Issue

Section

Articles