Magnitude of Childhood Vaccine Hesitancy and Associated Individual/Social Group Factors among Parents in Degahbur Town, Somali Region, Ethiopia
AbstractSince the introduction of effective and safe vaccines, vaccination has made enormous contributions to public health. Throughout its time, the effectiveness of vaccination programs were governed by multiple factors. Vaccine hesitancy is an emerging public health concern which gained more attention in recent years. Magnitude of vaccine hesitancy is not well known across many parts of the world. The objective of this study was to assess magnitude of childhood vaccine hesitancy and associated individual/social group factors among parents in Degahbur town. Community based cross-sectional study was undertaken in 422 households. Cluster sampling technique was employed to select six study units in Degahbur. Structured questionnaire was used for data collection. EPIDATA 3.02 was used for data entry and SPSS version 20 for data analysis. Bivariate and multivariate analysis was conducted to check the associations between outcome and explanatory variables using binary logistic regression model. Out of the total 422 households selected, 412 (97.6%) have responded to the interviews. From the 412 study participants, 46 (11.2%) were labelled as vaccine hesitant. Perceiving vaccination as not health beneficial (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 3.84, 95% CI (1.2, 13.6)), Beliefs in other alternatives (AOR= 4.8, 95% CI (1.5, 15.4)), beliefs that vaccination can’t protect children from serious diseases (AOR= 5.82, 95% CI (1.3, 25.6)) and being daily laborer (AOR= 12.9, 95% CI (2.6, 63.5) were predictors of vaccine hesitancy.Magnitude of childhood vaccine hesitancy in Degahbur is lower than that reported in other studies. In this study, negative perceptions and beliefs towards vaccines and occupation of parents are associated with vaccine hesitancy. Community based health education programs and vaccination surveillance system should be advocated and developed.
World Health Organization, Ed. (2013). “Vaccine preventable disease surveillance manual.”
World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund (2005). "Global Immunization Vision and Strategy 2006-2015”.
The Royal College of Pathologists of Australia (2012). "Immunization and Vaccine Preventable Diseases. "
Global Immunization Vision and Strategy (2006). "Challenges in global immunization and the Global Immunization Vision and Strategy."
Novelli, V., Khalil, N., Metarwah, B., El-Baba, F., Nahar, R., Abu- Nahya, M. (1991). "Childhood immunization in the state of Qatar: Implications for improving coverage." Annals of Saudi Medicine 11(2): pp. 201-4.
Wiysonge, C., Uthman, O., Ndumbe, P., Hussey, G. (2012) "Individual and Contextual Factors Associated with Low Childhood Immunisation Coverage in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Multilevel Analysis." PLoS ONE 7, e37905 DOI: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037905.
Federal Ministry of Health, Ed. (2015). “Ethiopia national expanded programme on immunization.” Comprehensive multi-year plan 2016 – 2020. Addis Ababa.
Lafond, A. and L. Pensieres (2015). "Determinants of Vaccine Uptake in Low Resource Settings."
Dempsey, A., Schaffer, S., Singer, D., Butchart, A., Davis, M., Freed, GL. (2011). "Alternative vaccination schedule preferences among parents of young children." Pediatrics 128(5): 848:856.
Larson, H., Cooper, L., Eskola, J., Katz, S., Ratzan, S. (2011). "Addressing the vaccine confidence gap." 378(9790): 526–35.
Kennedy, A., LaVail, K., Nowak, G., Basket, M., Landry, S. (2011). "Confidence about vaccines in the United States: Understanding parent’s perceptions." Health Aff. 30(6): 1151-9.
Gellin, B., Maibach, E., Marcuse, E. (2000) "Do parents understand immunizations? A national telephone survey." 106, 1097–1102 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.106.5.1097.
Margaret, Y., Rebekah, M., Marcy, C. (2013). "Vaccine hesitancy among mothers of 3 years old children."
Larson, H., Jarret, C., Eckersberger, E., Smith, D., Peterson, P. (2012). "Understandingvaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global per-spective: a systematic review of published literature, 2007-2012 " Vaccine 32(19): 2150-9.
Judith, C., Cathy, J., Shirley, A., Cathy, E., Sue, M., Sharon, L. (2002). "Refusals and Delay of Immunization Within Southwest Alberta. Understanding Alternative Beliefs and Religious Perspectives." Canadian Journal of Public Health 109.
Philip, J., Sharon, G., Edgar K., Marcuse., Zhen, Z., Christina, G., Cynthia, H., Beth, H. (2011). "Parental Delay or Refusal of Vaccine Doses, Childhood Vaccination Coverage at 24 Months of Age, and the Health Belief Model." Public Health Reports 126.
Gowda, C. and A. Dempsey (2013). "The rise (and fall?) of parental vaccine hesitancy." Hum Vaccin Immunother 9(8): 1755-62.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- By submitting the processing fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.
- It should be clear for authors that the Editor In Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper. The Editor In Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor In Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 7 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor In Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he have the right to accept\reject the paper.B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s). C. the Editor In Chief himself evaluates the paper.
- Author will take the responsibility what so ever if any copyright infringement or any other violation of any law is done by publishing the research work by the author
- Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.
- If at any time, due to any legal reason, if the journal stops accepting manuscripts or could not publish already accepted manuscripts, we will have the right to cancel all or any one of the manuscripts without any compensation or returning back any kind of processing cost.
- The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.