Relation of Dyadic and Small Group Communications to Adolescent Attitude Formation in Bogor City, West Java, Indonesia

Authors

  • Sukarelawati Sukarelawati Department of Communication, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Djuanda University, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Undang Suryatna Department of Communication, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Djuanda University, Bogor, Indonesia

Keywords:

Adolescent Attitude Formation, Dyadic Communication, Small Group Communication, Bogor City.

Abstract

The research held in Bogor City aims at describing the dyadic communication, the small group communication, and the adolescent attitude formation, and analyzing the relation of dyadic and small group communications to adolescent attitude formation. In the research, the dyadic communication indicates the very good result by mean score 4.37. The small group communication indicates the good result by mean score 3.87. The adolescent attitude formation indicates the good result by mean score 3.47. In the correlation test, the relation of dyadic communication to adolescent attitude formation finds correlation coefficient 0.372 meaning that there is a positive but weak correlation. The relation of small group communication to adolescent attitude formation finds correlation coefficient 0.414 meaning that there is a positive but moderate correlation. The research concludes that the interpersonal communication in family, both dyadicly and by small group, generally relates to the adolescent attitude formation, both on cognitive, affective and conative domains.

References

Asmaya, Fela, 2015, Pengaruh Penggunaan Media Sosial Face Book Terhadap Perilaku Prososial Remaja Di Kenagarian Koto Bangun Riau, http://www.e-junal.com/2016/03/pengaruh-pengguna-media-sosial.html.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Bogor, 2017, Kota Bogor Dalam Angka (Bogor City in Figures) 2017, Bogor: Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Bogor.

Davis, Gordon B., 1994, Managemen Sistem Informasi, Jakarta: PT. Medas Surya Grafindo.

DeVito, Joseph A., 1991, Human Communication: The Basic Course, 5th Edition, New York: HarperCollins.

Devito, Joseph A., 1997, The Interpersonal Communication, New York-USA: Longman Publishing Group.

Devito, Joseph A., 2011, Komunikasi Antar Manusia, Tangerang: Karisma Publishing Group.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attitude_(psychology.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyad_(sociology).

http://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/13-1-understanding-small-groups/.

http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/attitude.html.

Ibrahim, Ratih, 2014, Trending Topic: Pacaran Usia Dini. Jakarta: Metro TV.

Infante, Dominic A., Rancer, Andrew S., and Womack, Deanna F., 1993, Building Communication Theory, Second Edition, Illinois-USA: Waveland Press, Inc.

Sukarelawati dan Salbiah, Euis, 2016, “Model Kekuatan Karakteristik dan Persepsi tentang Infotainment dengan Adopsi Inovasi Pemirsa dalam Pembangunan Informasi”, Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, Vol 7, No 1 (2016), Bogor: Universitas Djuanda, https://doi.org/10.30997/jsh.v7i1.485.

Suryani, Murni Wan, 2016, “Komunikasi Keluarga Dalam Upaya Berinternet Sehat Di RT IV RW XI Kelurahan Delima Kecamatan Tampan Pekanbaru Riau”, http://www.e-jurnal.com/2016/03/komunikasi-keluarga-dalam-upaya.html.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-10

How to Cite

Sukarelawati, S., & Suryatna, U. (2018). Relation of Dyadic and Small Group Communications to Adolescent Attitude Formation in Bogor City, West Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 42(1), 94–102. Retrieved from https://www.gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/9317

Issue

Section

Articles