Institution Relation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Coal Mining Company in Empowerment of Horticulture Farmers
Keywords:
CSR, institution, Empowerment, Farmers, Horticulture.Abstract
CSR has become an important part in the issue of sustainable development that has a lot of positive activities, especially in the areas of health, education and improving the welfare of the community in accordance with the main livelihoods. One of the main important livelihoods is the business of horticulture farmers who still need empowerment.Therefore, it is important to analyse the CSR relationship of coal companies by empowering horticulture farmers. Considering that coal companies still carry negative impacts on the environment and have not had a positive impact on improving the welfare of the community. In addition, an important part in the analysis of coal company responsibility for the environment and society is related to CSR institutions which in developing countries are still the cause of the success of CSR. The purpose of the research is to formulate the institutional relations of CSR of coal companies to empowerment horticulture farmers.
References
Manjula,R. and L.P. Ramalingam. “Sustainable Development in Respect of Authentic Corporate Social Responsibility. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Global Business, Economics, Finance and Social Sciences (GB14 Conference) Chennai, India, 11-13 July 2014. pp. 3-5
Jenkins, H., & Obara, L. “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the mining industry–the risk of community dependency”. In CRRC. Queen’s University Belfast. 7-9 September 2008. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.466.417&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Pp 1-20
Visser, Wayne. Developing Countries. In Wayne Visser, Dirk Matten, Manfred Pohl, Nick Tolhurst (eds). The A to Z of corporate social responsibility : a complete reference guide to concepts, codes and organizations. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium. England. 2007. pp. 150
Mohan, A. Cultural Issues. InWayne Visser, Dirk Matten, Manfred Pohl, and Nick Tolhurst(eds). The A to Z of corporate social responsibility : a complete reference guide to concepts, codes and organizations. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium. England. 2007. pp. 147
Yin, Robert K., Studi Kasus: Desain & Metode. (Penterjemah Dhazuli Marzuki). Penerbit PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta. 2013. pp 10-15
Miles, Matthew B. and Hubberman, A.,Michael. Analisis Data Kualitatif, Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-Metode Baru.(Penerjemah Tjetje Rohendi). UI Press, Jakarta. 2009. pp. 25
Lin, Nan. Karen Cook. Ronald S. Burt (edts). Social Capital - Theory and Research. Published by Routledge, New York, USA. 2017. pp 4-6
Nuryanti, S., & Swastika, D. K. S. (2016, Augst). Peran kelompok tani dalam penerapan teknologi pertanian. In Forum penelitian agro ekonomi (Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 115-128). Avaiable http://ejurnal.litbang.pertanian.go.id/index.php/fae/article/view/3896 [ Nov.2,2016]
Ife, J. and Tesoriero, F., Community development: Alternatif pengembangan masyarakat di era globalisasi. Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta. 2008. pp 51-103
Mardikanto, Totok. Konsep - konsep pemberdayaan masyarakat. Penerbit UNS Press, Surakarta. 2010. pp 25-50
Scott, W. Richard. Institutions and Organizations: ideas, interests and identites. 4th Edition. Thousand Oaks. Sage Publications. Inc. Unity Kingdom. 2014. Pp 59-75
Jackson, Gregory. Actors And Institutions. In Glenn Morgan, et al. The Oxford Handbook Of Comparative Institutional Analysis. Published by Oxford University Press Inc., New York. 2010. Pp. 63-85
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.
