Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices on Antimicrobial Use among Poult Keepers in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania

Authors

  • Saxon J. Mwambene
  • Augustino A. Chengula
  • Adelard B. Mtenga
  • Abubakar S. Hoza

Keywords:

Antimicrobial, Attitude Resistance, Dar es Salaam, Knowledge, Practices

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an emerging public health issue posing a threat to humans, livestock, and ecosystems globally, In Tanzania, the poultry sector contributes the majority share of animal-source protein. The irrational and excessive use of antimicrobials in the poultry sector may increase the risk of AMR residue contamination in the poultry products value chain. Addressing the challenge of AMR requires interventions from multiple stockholders including the poultry farmers. Therefore, this study was carried out to evaluate KAP regarding the use of antimicrobials among poultry keepers in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. The findings of the current investigation provide baseline evidence about the KAP of poultry farmers from Low-income resources and offer insights into designing interventions and policies for the use of AMU and AMR in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from January to June 2023 using a quantitative research approach. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect socio-demographic and KAP data through face-to-face interviews. Responses related to the KAP triad were assigned scorers and aggregated for each participant. Data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine predictors of KAP scores.

Results: The results demonstrated that most of the respondents, 91.1%, had sufficient knowledge (?2 =151.143, p<0.001) regarding AMU and AMR. Furthermore, 61.2% of respondents had a negative attitude (?2 =11.161, p<0.001) and 89.7% had bad practice (?2 =141.416, p<0.001) towards AMU. Additionally, sex, age category, marital status, level of education, and occupation did not influence practice regarding AMU.  The respondents’ practices from different districts varied significantly, with respondents from Temeke district having 4.282 poor practices compared to those from other districts (p=0.012, AOR=4.282, C. I 1.373-13.357). Surprisingly, the results also showed that having a secondary school education had an impact 0.42 times as other education levels on the knowledge of the AMU (p=0.01, AOR=0.42, C.I. =0.22-0.81)

Conclusion: The findings showed that having good knowledge regarding the use of antimicrobials does not guarantee one has good practices or a positive attitude regarding the use of antimicrobials in poultry production. The government should ensure education and advisory services for poultry farmers on proper AMU, enforce current veterinary laws and regulations on antimicrobials, and implement an AMU surveillance system. It is, therefore, necessary to create and bolster policies that support the responsible use of antimicrobials in poultry.

Author Biographies

  • Saxon J. Mwambene

    Tanzania Medicines and Medical Devices Authority, P. O. Box 77150 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania,Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Parasitology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3019, Morogoro, Tanzania

  • Augustino A. Chengula

    Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Parasitology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3019, Morogoro, Tanzania

  • Adelard B. Mtenga

    Tanzania Medicines and Medical Devices Authority, P. O. Box 77150 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

  • Abubakar S. Hoza

    Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Parasitology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3019, Morogoro, Tanzania

References

[1] S. Flasche and K. E. Atkins, “Balancing Benefits and Risks of Antibiotic Use,” vol. 218, pp. 1351–1353, 2018, doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy344.

[2] World Health Organization, WHO Report on Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption. 2018. [Online]. Available: http://apps.who.int/iris%0Ahttps://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/277359/9789241514880-eng.pdf

[3] Y. Ben, C. Fu, M. Hu, L. Liu, M. H. Wong, and C. Zheng, “Human health risk assessment of antibiotic resistance associated with antibiotic residues in the environment: A review,” Environ. Res., vol. 169, no. July 2018, pp. 483–493, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.11.040.

[4] B. T. Rugumisa et al., “Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant fecal Escherichia coli isolates from penned broiler and scavenging local chickens in Arusha, Tanzania,” J. Food Prot., vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 1424–1429, 2016, doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-584.

[5] O. P. Lenox and H. M. Said, “Variations in village chicken management packages in two agro-ecological zones of Tanzania,” Int. J. Livest. Prod., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 42–49, 2018, doi: 10.5897/ijlp2017.0422.

[6] S. Michael et al., “Tanzania livestock master plan Developed by the Tanzania Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries (MLF) and the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) livestock master plan team,” 2018.

[7] H. E. Nonga, M. Mariki, E. D. Karimuribo, and R. H. Mdegela, “Assessment of antimicrobial usage and antimicrobial residues in broiler chickens in Morogoro Municipality, Tanzania,” Pakistan J. Nutr., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 203–207, 2009, doi: 10.3923/pjn.2009.203.207.

[8] L. A. Munuo, A. A. S. Katakweba, B. M. Lyimo, and A. P. Muhairwa, “Prevalence, characterization and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella isolates from healthy broiler and free-range chickens in Morogoro, Tanzania,” Tanzan. J. Health Res., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.4314/thrb.v23i1.6.

[9] M. A. Caudell et al., “Antimicrobial use and veterinary care among agro-pastoralists in Northern Tanzania,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2017, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170328.

[10] C. J. Roulette et al., “A two-month follow-up evaluation testing interventions to limit the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistant bacteria among Maasai of northern Tanzania,” BMC Infect. Dis., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2017, doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2857-z.

[11] G. Frumence et al., “Practices and challenges of veterinary paraprofessionals in regards to antimicrobial use and resistance in animals in dar es salaam, tanzania,” Antibiotics, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10060733.

[12] Z. I. Kimera, S. E. Mshana, M. M. Rweyemamu, L. E. G. Mboera, and M. I. N. Matee, “Antimicrobial use and resistance in food-producing animals and the environment: An African perspective,” Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-0697-x.

[13] J. M. Chah, S. C. Nwankwo, I. O. Uddin, and K. F. Chah, “Knowledge and practices regarding antibiotic use among small-scale poultry farmers in Enugu State, Nigeria,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 4, p. e09342, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09342.

[14] M. Gilbert et al., “Income disparities and the global distribution of intensively farmed chicken and pigs,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1–15, 2015, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133381.

[15] URT., “Administrative Units Population Distribution Report,” Natl. Popul. House Census Tanzania. Natl. Bur. Stat. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 2022.

[16] C. Sindato et al., “Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding antimicrobial use and resistance among communities of Ilala, Kilosa and Kibaha districts of Tanzania,” Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00862-y.

[17] F. Moffo et al., “Knowledge , attitudes , practices and risk perception of rural poultry farmers in Cameroon to antimicrobial use and resistance,” Elsevier, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105087.

[18] R. Efendi, E. Sudarnika, I. Wayan Teguh Wibawan, and T. Purnawarman, “An assessment of knowledge and attitude toward antibiotic misuse by small-scale broiler farmers in Bogor, West Java, Indonesia,” Vet. World, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 707–713, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.707-713.

[19] Z. I. Kimera et al., “Determination of oxytetracycline residues in cattle meat marketed in the Kilosa district, Tanzania,” Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res., vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2015, doi: 10.4102/OJVR.V82I1.911.

[20] M. H. Moosavy, S. Esmaeili, F. B. Amiri, E. Mostafavi, and T. Z. Salehi, “Detection of Salmonella spp in commercial eggs in Iran,” Iran. J. Microbiol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 50–54, 2015.

[21] S. Chilawa et al., “Knowledge , Attitudes , and Practices of Poultry Farmers on Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in Kitwe , Zambia : Implications on Antimicrobial Stewardship,” pp. 60–81, 2023, doi: 10.4236/ojas.2023.131005.

[22] H. E. Nonga, C. Simon, E. D. Karimuribo, and R. H. Mdegela, “Assessment of Antimicrobial Usage and Residues in Commercial Chicken Eggs from Smallholder Poultry Keepers in Morogoro Municipality , Tanzania,” pp. 339–344, 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01226.x.

[23] M. Drahansky et al., “We are IntechOpen , the world ’ s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists , for scientists TOP 1 %,” Intech, vol. i, no. tourism, p. 13, 2016, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/57353.

[24] M. M. Hassan, A. Kalam, A. Alim, and S. Shano, “Knowledge , Attitude , and Practices on Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance among Commercial Poultry Farmers,” 2021.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-17

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Saxon J. Mwambene, Augustino A. Chengula, Adelard B. Mtenga, & Abubakar S. Hoza. (2026). Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices on Antimicrobial Use among Poult Keepers in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 79(1), 163-181. https://www.gssrr.org/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/17144