Regression Analysis on School Practices and Quality of Education in the New Normal in Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao

Authors

  • Marilou K. Siva, Ph.D Secondary School Teacher, Datu Saudi Uy Ampatuan MNHS, Datu Piang, Maguindanao 9607, Philippines
  • Joanie T. Haramain, Ed.D Faculty of the College of Teacher Education and Graduate School, Cotabato State University, Sinsuat Avenue, Cotabato City 9600, Philippines

Keywords:

Collaboration, Curriculum Development, Innovation, Outcome-based Education, Quality Education, School Practices, Regression Analysis

Abstract

Education is a vital key to success but quality education is more vital to achieve sustainable success. Academic institutions aim to execute capabilities to attain educational success because of their goals to provide students with quality education and enriching experiences. This research examined the best predictors between school practices to quality education specifically among public secondary schools in Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao, Philippines. This study utilized quantitative research method particularly the descriptive-predictive research design to examine the significant influence of school practices to quality education. Data were obtained from the school heads and teachers as respondents of the study who were determined through a stratified random sampling method with proportional allocation technique using the Slovin’s formula showing a five percent margin of error and a sample population size of 294. A researcher-made questionnaire validated by experts and pilot tested which yielded 0.963 coefficients using the Cronbach’s Alpha with internal consistency was used in gathering data. Full model regression analysis was used to determine which among the school practices best influence quality education. Findings revealed that the full model regression matrix between quality of education in terms of outcome-based learning, innovation, curriculum development and stakeholders’ collaboration and school practices showed a significant effect leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis. In the overall stepwise regression matrix, mobilization of school learning action cells, adherence to child-friendly school and administration of standardized test were the best predictors of the quality of education with Beta and t coefficients of .704 or 28.651; .463 or 18.291; and -.161 or -7.125 respectively.

Hence, the null hypothesis was rejected. However, adoption to modular-printed distance learning showed no significant effect so the null hypothesis was accepted. Thus, school practices have a significant effect on the quality of education. Sustaining best practices, support, initiatives, and innovations by stakeholders can contribute for the efficient attainment of quality education.

References

OECD (2016). “Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies and Skills.” OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264265097-en.

A. Schleicher (2018). “World Class: How to build a 21st-century school system, Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education.” OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/.

P. Sammons et al. (2016). “The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference.” Educational Administration, vol. 52 (2) pp. 221–258. Retrieved on May 20, 2022 from https://core.ac.uk/

B. Faubert (2012). “A Literature Review of School Practices to Overcome School Failure”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 68, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/

A. Best et al. (2018). “Topical questions on teacher management.” Paris: IIEP UNESCO.

J. Colby, M. Witt et al. (2000). “Defining Quality Education.” UNICEF New York.

A. Schleicher (2018). “World Class: How to build a 21st-century school system, Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education.” OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/

J.W. Creswell (2013). “Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach.” Sage publications.

S. Taylor (2023). What is Regression Analysis? Retrieved from https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/

P.T. Ng (2009). “Innovation in education: some observations and questions. International Journal of Innovation in Education, vol. 1 (1), pp. 8-11.

C. P. M. Wai (2017). “Innovation and social impact in higher education: some lessons from Tohoku university and the open university of Hong Kong.” Open Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 5(09), p. 139.

J. T. Haramain, L. E. Tuyo, F. A. Dalantay, "The Decision-Making Styles of Bangsamoro Educational Leaders in the Philippines", International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), vol. 11 Issue 6, June 2022, pp. 1773-1783, https://www.ijsr.net/get_abstract.php?paper_id=SR22627103803

OECD (2018). “Curriculum Flexibility and Autonomy in Portugal - an OECD Review,” OECD Publishing, Paris

M.A. Alsubaie. “Curriculum Development: Teacher Involvement in Curriculum Development.” Journal of Education and Practice, vol.7(9), pp. 106-107, 2016.

W. Tyler (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

L. M. Anchilo. “Supervisory Management Guidelines in the Implementation of School Improvement Plan (SIP). Manila: Philippine Normal University, 2012.

B. Bruns, D. Filmer, & H. A. Patrinos (2011). “Making Schools Work: New Evidence of Accountability Reforms.” Washington DC: The World Bank. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8679-8

World Bank (2008). “What is school based management?” [Online/what_is_SBM.pdf] accessed on March 7, 2022.

DepEd Order No. 40, s. 2012- DepEd Child Protection Policy.

DepEd Order 35, s. 2016. Learning Action Cell (LAC) as the Kto12 Basic Education Program School–Based Continuing Professional Development Strategy for the Improvement of Teaching and Learning

L. M. Anchilo. “Supervisory Management Guidelines in the Implementation of School Improvement Plan (SIP).” Manila: Philippine Normal University, 2012.

B. Bruns, D. Filmer, & H.A. Patrinos (2011). “Making Schools Work: New Evidence of Accountability Reforms.” Washington DC: The World Bank. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8679-8

M. Ice, A. Thapa, & J. Cohen (2015). “Recognizing community voice and a youth-led school-community partnership in the school climate improvement process.” School Community Journal, vol. 25(1), pp. 9-28.

DepEd Order 44, s. 2015 – Guidelines on the Enhanced School Improvement Planning (SIP) Process and the School Report Card (SRC).

J. Colby, M. Witt, et al. (2000). “Defining Quality Education.” UNICEF New York.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-05

How to Cite

Marilou K. Siva, Ph.D, & Joanie T. Haramain, Ed.D. (2023). Regression Analysis on School Practices and Quality of Education in the New Normal in Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 67(2), 306–319. Retrieved from https://www.gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/15502

Issue

Section

Articles