A new framework for e-learning using Learning Style and Personality
Keywords:
e-learning, learning styles, personality types, personalize e-learning, instructional designAbstract
This paper presents the new framework for providing the appropriate contents for users in an e-learning system based on their Learning Style and Personalities. For seek best practice in e-learning Design. A large number of research attempts personalize contents based on users in an e-learning system. Most research focus only personalize e-learning based on learning style. In order to differentiate users from each other, users behaviors both observable and unobservable are introduced. The relationship between e-learning content and users behaviors such as personality is determined by groups of users.
References
Allport, G. W. (l937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Aviram A, Ronen Y, Somekh S, Winer A, Sarid A (2008). Self-Regulated Personalized Learning (SRPL): Developing iClass
Bonnestter, B. & Suiter, J. (2007) The Universal Lanquage DISC: A Reference Manual. Phoenix, AZ: Target Training International, Ltd.Bosse-Smith, L. (2005). More than motivation: Understanding behavior is a key to strong leadership and training. Fundamental,T+D, 22-23.
Buch, K. and Sena, C. (2001).
Calver, C. A., Howard, R.A. and Lane W.D. (1999). Enhacing Student Learning Through Hypermedia Courseware and Incorporation of Student Learning Style. IEEE Transactions on Education, 42(1), 33-38.
Cattell, R. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476-506.
Denphaisarn, N. (2009) AIDE Adaptive instuctional design model for E-learning. IEEE
Felder, R. M. (1993). Reaching the Second Tier: Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
Gagn
Inscape Publishing. (1996). DiSC Classic and models of personality. Retrieved from http://www.inscapepublishing.com/pdf/PPSMOPO-232.pdf
Jeffrey, S. (2009). Using the DISC model to improve communication effectiveness. Industrial and Commercial Training, 41(3), 151-154.
Jung J, Graf S (2008). An Approach for Personalized Web-based Vocabulary Learning through Word Association Games. SAINT, pp. 325-328.
Kim IS (2009). The Relevance of Multiple Intelligences to CALL Instruction. The Reading Matrix, 9(1): 1-21.
Klassen, P.T (2006). Style Insight
Kolb, D.A. (1984), Experiential Learning, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Clifts, NJ.
Kummerow, J. M., Barger, N. J., & Kirby, L. K. (1997). WORKTypes. New York: Warner Books.
Li.Y .S, Chen, P .S . & Tsai, S .J . (2008): A comparison of the Learning Styles among Differenct Nursing Programs in Taiwan: Implications for Nursing Education. Nurse Education Today, 28 , pp. 70-76.
Lim DH, Morris ML, Yoon SW (2006). Combined Effect of Instructional
and Learner Variables on Course Outcomes within An OnlineLearning Environment. J. Interact. Online Learn., 5(3): 255-269.
Lui, F. (2007). Personalized Learning Using Adapted Content Design for Science Students. Proceedings of the ECCE 2007 Conference, 28-31 August 2007, London, UK, 293-296
Marston, W.M. (1928). The emotions of normal people. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company.
Martinez M (2001). Mass Customization: Designing for Successful Learning. Int. J. Educ. Technol., 2(2): 3-20.
Martinez M (2002). Beyond Classroom Solutions: New Design Perspectives for Online Learning Excellence. Educ. Technol. Soc., 5(2): 1-6.
Meisgeier, C., Murphy, E., & Meisgeier, C. (1989). A teacher
Myers, I., & Myers, P. (1980). Gifts differing. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Paredes, P., and Rodriguez, P. (2002). Considering Learning Styles in Adaptive Web-based Education. In Proceedings of the 6th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics en Orlando
(Florida, 2002), 481-485.
Pervin, L. A. (1990). Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: The Guilford Press.
Provost, J., & Anchors, S. (1987). Applications of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in higher education. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Retalis S, Paraskeva F, Tzanavari A, Garzotto F (2004). Learning Styles and Instructional Design as Inputs for Adaptive Educational Hypermedia Material Design. Paper presented at the "Information and Communication Technologies in Education" - Fourth Hellenic Conference with International Participation, Athens, Greece.
Rogers, C. R. (1993). The interpersonal relationship in the facilitation of learning. In R. Edwards et al. (Eds.), Culture and the processes of adult learning (pp. 228-242). London: Routledge.
Schiefele U (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educ. Psychol.,26: 299-323.
Sewall, T. J. (1986). The measurement of learning style: A critique of four assessment tools. Green Bay, WI: Wisconsin University Assessment Center.
Shaver, P. (1984). Emotions, relationships, and health: The Review of Personality and Social Psychology Series #5. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Surjono, H.D (2011). The Design of Adaptive E-Learning System based on Student
Todorava, M. and Valcheva, D., and Nikolova, M. (2006) Collaborative learning through multimedia interaction, 3rd E-Learning Conference-Computer Science Education, Coimbra, Portugal
Thompson MM (2008). Individual Difference Theory and Research: Application to Multinational Coalition Teamwork. Paper presented at the HFM-142 Symposium: Adaptability in Coalition Teamwork (NATORTO-HFM-142), pp. KN2-1 - KN2-28.
Trinidad S (2003). Working with Technology-rich Learning Environments: Strategies for Success. In M. S. Khine and D. Fisher (Eds.), Technology-Rich Learning Environments: A future Perspective. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, pp. 97-113.
Weber K, Martin MM, Cayanus JL (2005). Student interest: A two-study re-examination of the concept. Commun. Q., 53(1): 71-86.
Wikipedi
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.
