Character Evaluation of Upland Rice Varieties on Various Water Provision Levels

Authors

  • Laila Nazirah Faculty of Agriculture Malikussaleh University Indonesia
  • Edison Purba Faculty of Agriculture North Sumatera University Indonesia
  • Chairani Hanum Faculty of Agriculture North Sumatera University Indonesia
  • Abdul Rauf Faculty of Agriculture North Sumatera University Indonesia

Keywords:

varieties, upland rice, the level of water provision.

Abstract

This study aims to determine the efficiency of water use between genotype and identify the characters of upland rice varieties tolerant to drought stress. The experiment was conducted in a plastic house in North Aceh, in January 2015 to May 2015. The study design was split plot design with three replications and two treatment factors. The first factor is drought stress (C) which consisted of 4 capacity airy levels namely: C1: 20%, C2: 40%, C3: 60% and C4: 80%. The second factor is the 10 upland rice varieties which consists of three groups, namely (tolerant group varieties) which consists of Ciapus, Inpago 4, and Inpago 8; (moderate group varieties) which consist of Inpago 5, Situ Bangendit, Inpago7, Towuti; and (susceptible group varieties) which consists of Inpari 6 Jete, Inpari 33 and Sintanur. The results of the study showed changes in character of dry root weight and ratio of canopy, number of panicles per clump1000, grains and grain production per clump as a result of drought stress at 20% of field capacity (C1). Tolerant varieties (Inpago 4, Inpago 8, Ciapus) shows avoidance mechanisms to drought stress by increasing weight of dry root, reducing the ration of canopy and decreasing the number of 1000 grains and grain production is smaller and stable.

References

Suhendrata, T., Tyasdjaja, A. dan Bahri, S.Teknologi Budidaya Padi Gogo. 2007.

Lafitte R, Curtois B. Interpreting cultivar environment interaction for Yeild In Upland rice: assigning value to drought-adaptive traits. Crop Sci, 42;1409-1420.2002.

O

Peng S dan Ismail AM. Physiological basis of yield and environmental adaptation in rice. In Nguyen HT and blum A (eds). Physiology and biotechnology integration for plant breeding. Marcel dekker, Inc. New York.2004.

Gowdaa VRV, Henrya BA, Yamauchie A, Ahashidharb HE, Serraj RA.Root biology and genetic improvement for drought avoidance in rice. Field Crops Res. 122:1-13. 2011.

Pirdashti h, Tahmasebi SZ, Nematza DG. Study of Water Stress Effects in different growth stages on yield and yield components of different rice cultivars 4 th. International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, Australia. 2004.

Liu K, Ye Y, Tang C, Wang Z, Yang J. Responses of ethylene and ACC in rice grains to Soil moisture and their relations to grain filling. Frontiers of Agric in China. 2:172-180.2008.

Praba ML, Cairns JE, Babu RC, Lafitte HR. Indentification of physiological traits underlying cultivar differences in drought tolerance in rice and wheat Agron ang Crop Sci. 195:30:46. 2009.

Hijmans RJ, Serraj R.Modeling spatial and temporal variation of drought in rice production. In: Serraj R, Bennet J, hardy B, Editor. Drought Frontiers in Rice: Crop Improvement for Increased Rainfed Production. World Scientific, IRRI, hlm 19-31.2008.

Downloads

Published

2016-10-09

How to Cite

Nazirah, L., Purba, E., Hanum, C., & Rauf, A. (2016). Character Evaluation of Upland Rice Varieties on Various Water Provision Levels. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 30(1), 276–283. Retrieved from https://www.gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/6359

Issue

Section

Articles