Model Development of Principal Performanc Through Empirical Study on Junior High School in Medan Indonesia
Keywords:
development, model, performance.Abstract
The purpose of this research is to find a theoretical model of the performance of the Junior High School (SMP) Principals that is effective based on the empirical study of variable exogenous and endogenous variable performance. This research method called the survey method that is exploratory because the research data captured by the questionnaire. The population in this research are all the principal of SMP in Medan on Academic Year 2015/2016 which number as many as 348 people. Furthermore, to obtain a sample used Proportional Random Sampling with reference to the provisions of Isaac and Michael at the significance level of 5%, in order to get a sample of 200 people. This research was conducted in Medan in two stages. The first phase in 2016 to get the instrument variable exogenous and endogenous variable raw performance. Based on trial results of research instrument was conducted in July 2016 on the subject of study as part of the study population obtained valid and reliable research instruments.
References
Suryadi, Ace. 2014. Pendidikan Indonesia Menuju 2025. Outlook: Permasalahan, Tantangan, & Alternatif Kebijakan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Menengah. Kebijakan dan Program Kerja Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Menengah Tahun 2011. Jakarta: Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Menengah, 2011.
Kepala Dinas Pendidikan Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Sinar Indonesia Baru. Anjloknya Mutu Pendidikan di Sumut Jadi Renungan Bagi Pemangku Kepentingan. Medan, 6 Desember 2014, Halaman 14, Kolom 7
Castetter, William B. The Personnel Function in Educational Administration (New York : Mc Millan Publishing, Co., 1981.
Restu.
Wijaya, Candra. Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Perilaku Kepemimpinan, Kepuasan Kerja, Stres Pekerjaan, dan Motivasi Kerja terhadap Keefektifan Kerja Pegawai Administrasi IAIN Sumatera Utara. Sinopsis Disertasi. Medan: Universitas Negeri Medan, 2015.
Nasrun. 2015. Pengaruh Pemberian Insenif, Kompetensi Kepribadian Guru, Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah, Motivasi Kerja terhadap Kinerja Guru SMA Negeri Kota Medan. Sinopsis Disertasi. Medan: Universitas Negeri Medan.
Robbins, Stephen P. dan Timothy A. Judge. 2009. Organizational Behaviour. New Jersey : Pearson Education, Inc.,
Schein, Edgar H. 1992. Organizational Culture and Leadership. Second Edition.San Francisco: Jossey-Bassa Publisher.
Gibson, James L., John M. Ivancevich, dan James H. Donnelly, Organisasi, terj. Nunuk Adiarni, Jakarta : Binarupa Aksara, 1996.
Lunenburg, Fred C. dan Allan C. Ornstein. (2000). Educational Administration. Concepts and Practices. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Lussier, Robert N. 1997. Management. Concepts. Applications. Skill Development. Ohio: South-Western College Publishing.
Mullins, Laurie J. (2005). Management and Organisational Behaviour. London: Prentice Hall.
Mintorogo, Antonius. 1997. Kepemimpinan dalam Organisasi. Jakarta: STIA-LAN.
Nawawi, Hadari. 2000. Kepemimpinan yang Efektif. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Newstrom, John W. (2007). Organizational Behaviour. Human Behaviour at Work. New York : Mc Graw Hill Companies.
Gatewood, Robert D. and Robert R. Taylor, and O. C. Ferrell. 1995. Management: Comprehension, Analysis and Application. Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional, 2011. Kepemimpinan Pembelajaran, Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan.
Colquitt, Jason A., Jeffery A. Lepine, dan Michael J. Wesson. (2009). Organizational Behaviour. Improving Perfomance and Commitment in the Workplace. New York : McGraw-Hill.
Walker, James W., 1992. Human Resources Strategy. Singapore: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Luthans, Fred. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi Terjemahan Vivin Andhika Yuwono, et. al., Yogyakarta: ANDI.
Baron, Robert A., dan Jerald Greenberg. 1990. Behavior in Organization: Understanding and Managing The Human Side of Work. Third Edition. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.
Buchanan, B. 2002. Building Organizational Commitment: The Socialization of Managers in Work Condition. Boston: Massachuset Institute of Technologi.
Meyer, J. P. dan N. J. Allen. 1991.
Robbins, Stephen P.. 1996. Organizational Behavior: Concepts,Controvercies, Applications, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Int. Inc.
Luthans, Fred. 1995. Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Franken, Robert E. 1992. Human Motivation. California-Books: Cole Publishing, Co.
Mangkunegara, A.A. Anwar Prabu. 2002. Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia Peerusahaan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Amstrong, Michael, dan Angela Baron. 1998. Performance Management. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.
Maier, N.R.F. 1987. Psychology in Industry. Boston: Houghton & Miffin.
Hersey, Paul, Kenneth H. Blanchard, dan Dewey E. Johnson. (1996). Managing Organizattional Behavior : Utilizing Human Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.,
Robbins, Stephen P., 2003. Perilaku Organisasi. Terj. Benyamin Molan. Klaten: Intan Sejati Klaten.
. Kreitner, Robert dan Angelo Kinicki. 2003. Perilaku Organisasi. Terj. Erly Swandy (Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Siburian, Paningkat. 2012. Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Perilaku Inovatif, Kepuasan Kerja, dan Motivasi Kerja terhadap Kinerja Kepala SMK. Sinopsis Disertasi. Medan: Universitas Negeri Medan.
Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan. 2007. Kepemimpinan Pendidikan Persekolahan yang Efektif. Jakarta: Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan.
Manullang, Martua, 2013. Pengaruh Pengetahuan Organisasi, Motivasi Berprestasi, Pengambilan Keputusan, dan Komitmen Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Kepala Sekolah.Disertasi. Medan: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Medan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.
