Life Cycle Analysis Based Evaluation of Desulfurisation Technologies

Authors

  • Ibrahim Altuwair Centre for Safety, Risk and Integrity Engineering (C-RISE) Faculty of Engineering & Applied Science, Memorial University, St. John
  • Faisal Khan Centre for Safety, Risk and Integrity Engineering (C-RISE) Faculty of Engineering & Applied Science, Memorial University, St. John
  • Salim Ahmed Centre for Safety, Risk and Integrity Engineering (C-RISE) Faculty of Engineering & Applied Science, Memorial University, St. John
  • Syed Imtiaz Centre for Safety, Risk and Integrity Engineering (C-RISE) Faculty of Engineering & Applied Science, Memorial University, St. John

Keywords:

desulfurization, environmental assessment, mathematical model, supercritical fluid, life cycle analysis, indicators.

Abstract

The study evaluates current desulfurisation technologies, namely hydrodesulfurisation (HDS), oxidativedesulfurisation (ODS) and supercritical fluid methods (SCF) considering different stages of life cycle. To evaluate these technologies, a functional unit of mass per unit of weight was chosen to weigh the environmental damage caused by each process. The assessment criteria include energy consumption categories (electricity, fuel oil, and diesel) and environmental impacts categories (global warming, acidification, and photochemical ozone formation). The total environmental impact was calculated based on Eco-99 indicators. Of the total environmental impacts, production is the most critical for both HDS and ODS technologies. Overall, SCF is identified as most energy saving technique.

Author Biography

Ibrahim Altuwair, Centre for Safety, Risk and Integrity Engineering (C-RISE) Faculty of Engineering & Applied Science, Memorial University, St. John

Engineering

References

Aravamudan, S. and Chien, M. and Hollie, K. (2003)

Brentrup F. Kusters J. Lammela J. Barraclough P. and Kuhlmann H. (2004)

Chen, Li, and Yang, 2007; Application of FGD system of coal-burning generator unit 35 (2), 57

Demirabas A., Alidrisi H., Balubaid A.

Environmental Canada (1994), pollution Prevention Plan: DOE FRAP. Environmental Performance Indicators for the chemical Industry (2001)-Association of the Dutch Chemical Industry (VNCI), Netherlands.

Fredrik G. and Pernilla B. (2013)

G

Fang, Chao, and Ma, 2009; The energy consumption and environmental impact of a color TV set in China, J. Clean Production 17 (1) 13

Harry B. (2000)

G

He B, Zheng X, Wen Y, Tong H, Chen M, Chen C. Temperature impact on SO2 removal efficiency by ammonia gas scrubbing. Energy Convers Manage 2003; 44:2175

He S, Xiang G, Li D, Li Y, Yao Q, Xu X. Technology optimization of wet flue gas desulfurization process. Environ Prog 2002; 21:1311

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,IPCC,(2001): (http://www,grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar,(last checked on Jan 15, 2016)

International Organization for Standardization, 2006. ISO 14040 Environmental Management Life Cycle Assessment Principles and Framework.

ISO 14041, 1998. ISO 14041 Environment Management-life Cycle Assessment-goal and Scope Definition and Inventory Analysis.

Jerry W. 2014;

Khan F. and Sadiq R. (2006)

Schuman S. and Shalit H. :

T. Kabe, Y. Aoyama, D. Wang, A. Ishihara, W. Qian, M. Hosoya and Q. Zhang, Appl. Catal., A, 2001; Life cycle analysis, 209, 209

Warych J, Szymanowski M. 2007; Model of the wet limestone flue gas desulfurization process for cost optimization. Ind Eng Chem Res; 40:2597

Warych J, Szymanowski M. 2007; Model of the wet limestone flue gas desulfurization process for cost optimization. Ind Eng Chem Res; 40:2597

Zou, Zhiping, Ma, Xiaoqian, Zhao, Zengli, Li, Haibin, Chen, Yong, 2004. Life cycle assessment on the hydropower project. Water Power 30 (4), 53e55.

Zhu JL, Wang YH, Zhang JC, Ma RY. 2005; Experimental investigation of adsorption of NO and SO2 on modified activated carbon sorbent from flue gases. Energy Convers Manage, 46:2173

Downloads

Published

2017-03-29

How to Cite

Altuwair, I., Khan, F., Ahmed, S., & Imtiaz, S. (2017). Life Cycle Analysis Based Evaluation of Desulfurisation Technologies. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 32(2), 226–250. Retrieved from https://www.gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/7128

Issue

Section

Articles