Perception of Mathematics Teachers Against Implementation of Curriculum 2013
Keywords:
perceptions of teachers, implementation, curriculum 2013.Abstract
This study aims to determine the perception of mathematics teachers on the implementation of curriculum 2013. This research method is descriptive qualitative. This research was conducted in Prayatna Junior High School Medan. Data collection techniques used were interviews and observation. Data were analyzed using data reduction, exposure (data display) and conclusion. Triangulation of data used is theoretical triangulation. Research subject of three mathematics teachers. The results obtained by a teacher have not been trained to make RPP in accordance with the curriculum 2013, and two teachers have been trained and able to make RPP, so it can be concluded that the training of making RPP for math teachers in the school has not been evenly distributed. Mathematics teachers also do not use the learning media and props to the maximum, because of the observations found no visual aids or students produced work. Implementation of curriculum 2013 on learning mathematics has not been effective.
References
Sanjaya, W. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2006.
Putra, S.N.L.
Mulyasa, E. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Bandung. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2007.
Tim Penyusun Kamus Pusat Bahasa. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Ed 3, Cet. 2. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2002.
Rakhmat, J. Psikologi Komunikasi, Cet. 15. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2000.
Shaleh, A. R., & Wahab, M. A. Psikologi Suatu Pengantar (dalam perspektif Islam), Cet. 1. Jakarta: Kencana, 2004.
Sarwono, S. W. Pengantar Umum Psikologi, Cet. 9. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 2003.
Kemendikbud. Permendikbud No. 22 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2016.
Marsh, C. J. Handbook for Beginning Teachers. Sydney: Addison Wesley Longman Australia Pry Limited, 1996.
Ghufron, A. Profil Tingkat Keinovasian Guru Dalam Implementasi KTSP. Laporan Penelitian. Yogyakarta, FIP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2007.
Suyono.
Finn, P. J. Helping Children Learn Language Art. New York: Longman, 1993.
Suyono.
Gillet, J. W., & Temple, C. Understanding Reading Problems: Assessment and Instruction. Fourth Edition. New York: HarperCollinsCollegePublishers, 1994.
Pappas, C. C., Kiefer, B. Z., & Levstik, L. S. An Integrated Language Perspective in The Elementary School. London: Longman, 1990.
Eanes, R. Content Area Literacy: Teaching for Today and Tomorrow. Albany: Delmar Publisher, 1997.
Langer, J., & Flihan, S. (2000). Writing and Reading Relationship: Constructive Task. [On-line]. Available: http:www.knowledgeloom.org/resources.jsp?location=6&tool/ [May 4, 2017]
Harjanti, M. H.
Gunawan, I. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2013.
Muzamiroh, M. L. Kupas Tuntas Kurikulum 2013 Kelebihan dan Kekurangan Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kata pena, 2013.
Burns, R Self-concept Development and Education, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, London. Internet: http:// www.cerme7unvi.rzeszowpl, 1982.
Ekwueme, C. O., & Meremikwu, A.
Sobur, A. Filsafat Komunikasi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2013.
Luneta, K., & Makonye, P. J.
Setiyani, R., dkk.
Guntur, M. I. S., dkk.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.
