Analysis of the European Union Countries and Turkey in Terms of Criminal Tendencies

Authors

  • Pelin Kasap Department of Statistics, Ondokuz May?s University, Samsun, Turkey
  • B. Bar?? Alkan Department of Statistics, Sinop University, Sinop, Turkey

Keywords:

correspondence analysis, clustering, criminal tendencies, Turkey, European Union Countries, crime.

Abstract

This study uses criminal tendencies data to reveal the relations between the member states of the European Union and Turkey. The relations between these countries and criminal tendency trends are of vital importance for our future. Eight factors in our research are used to show the impact of criminal tendencies for countries. These factors are homicide, violent crime, robbery, domestic burglary, motor vehicle theft, drug trafficking, number of police officers and prison population. It is possible to find many sources in the literature related to each of these factors for the member states of the European Union and Turkey. However, there is a need for studies to take all of these factors into account. So we can clearly identify the relations among countries in terms of criminal tendencies in a highly variable space. We use correspondence analysis method and clustering method based on chi-squared distance which is used for categorical data to analyze the relationship between these countries in terms of criminal tendencies. As a result, we can say that robbery, domestic burglary and motor vehicle theft trends in Estonia, Germany, Denmark, France and Ireland are similar. Also Turkey, Luxemburg, Slovenia and Croatia are in the same group. Mainly, these countries have homicide and drug trafficking trends. The other striking finding is that the trend of violent crime is high in the countries such as England, Sweden, Finland, Netherlands and Belgium which have a good level of education and income.

References

Aebi, M. F., Aubusson de Cavarlay, B., Barclay, G., Gruszczy?ska, B., Harrendorf, S., Heiskanen, M. and Shostko, O. 2010. European sourcebook of crime and criminal justice statistics-2010. Boom Juridische Uitgevers.

Aitchison J, Greenacre M. 2002. Biplots of compositional data. Applied Statistics; 51, 375-392.

Black, M.C., Basile, K.C., Breiding, M.J. and Ryan, G.W. 2014. Prevalence of sexual violence against women in 23 states and two U.S. territories, BRFSS 2005, Violence Against Women, Vol. 20(5), pp. 485-499.

Buonanno, P., Drago, F., Galbiati, R. and Zanella, G. 2011.

Buonanno, P., Drago, F. and Galbiati, R. 2014a. Response of Crime to Unemployment: An International Comparison, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 30,1, pp. 29-40.

Buonanno, P., Drago, F. and Galbiati, R. 2014b. How much should we trust crime statistics? A comparison between UE and US, SciencesPo, LIEPP (Laboratoire interdisciplinaire d

Clarke, S. 2013. Trends in crime and criminal justice, 2010, Eurostat

Dursun, S., Ayta

Gower, C. and Hand, D.J. 1996. Biplots, Chapman & Hill, London.

Gracia, E. and Tomas, J.M. 2014. Correlates of victim-blaming attitudes regarding partner violence against women among the Spanish general population, Violence Against Women, Vol. 20(1), pp. 26-41.

Greenacre M.J. Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. Academic Press. Inc. London; 1984. p. 223.

Greenacre, M. J. 1993. Biplots in correspondence Analysis. Journal of Applied Statistics, 20(2), 251-269.

Hauner, D., Kutan, A.M. and Spivey, C. 2012. Inequality and crime: evidence from Russia

Johnson RA and Wichern DW. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice & Hall, USA; 1998.

Krahe, B. 2018. Violence against women, Current Opinion in Psychology, Vol. 19. pp. 6-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.017.

Mota, J.C., Vasconcelos, A.G. and Assis, S.G. 2008. Correspondence analysis: a method for classifying similar patterns of violence against women, Cad. Saude Publica, Rio De Janelro, 24, 6, pp. 1397-1406.

Park M, Lee W.L., Lee JB, Song, SH. 2008. Several biplot methods applied to gene expression data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference; 138(2), 500-515.

Sharma, I. 2015. Violence against women: Where are the solutions?, Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 57(2), pp. 131-139.

Straus, M.A. 2014. Addressing violence by female partners is vital to prevent or stop violence against women: Evidence from the multisite batterer intervention evaluation, Violence Against Women, Vol. 20(7), pp. 889-899.

?ahin, H. 2015. A sociological analysis of women criminal in Turkey: A case study, European Scientific Journal, Special edition, pp. 194-203, ISSN: 1857-7881 (print).

Downloads

Published

2017-07-14

How to Cite

Kasap, P., & Alkan, B. B. (2017). Analysis of the European Union Countries and Turkey in Terms of Criminal Tendencies. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 34(3), 13–21. Retrieved from https://www.gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/7655

Issue

Section

Articles