The Impact of Intra-Household Gender Relations in Accessing Agricultural Extension Services for Improved Livelihoods: The Case of NAADS Beneficiary Sub-Counties in Kabale District

Authors

  • Peace Mbabazi Social Research Leader and PhD candidate, Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O Box 1410 Mbarara, Uganda
  • Godfrey B. Asiimwe Associate Professor and Dean, School: College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 72 Kampala, Uganda
  • Charles Tushaboomwe Kazooba Associate Professor, Faculty of Business Management Sciences Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O Box 1410 Mbarara, Uganda

Keywords:

Intra-household Gender relations, Agriculture extension Services, Livelihoods.

Abstract

This study explored the influence of intra-household gender relations in access to Agricultural Extension Services (AESs) for improved livelihoods as a pathway to long term poverty reduction. The study covered the four NAADS pioneer beneficiary Sub counties of Bubare, Bukiinda, Ikumba and Maziba in Kabale district. It analysed gender based relational differences prevailing between men and women in a household (HH) in the creation and recreation of secure livelihoods through AESs. A mixed method approach with cross sectional and exploratory research designs was used to collect data through documentary review, Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), HH surveys, Key Informant (KI) interviews and observation checklist. The study sample comprised of 181 farmers’ HHs and 14 KIs.

The study results revealed that intra-HH gender relations among the Bakiga people of Kabale district are situated within a patriarchal setting which exhibit men’s dominance over women’s decisions in major spheres of life which affects equal access to AESs. Although AESs have been  operational in the district for over a decade, their existence has not transformed farmers’ livelihoods in  which is majorly attributed to unequal gender relations with regard to gender roles and division of labour, resource distribution, ownership and control as well as decision making which are reinforced by the Bakiga’s patriarchal system. Extension system is “gender blind” and NAADS agents/officials pay little attention to the gender relations which are skewed in favour of men, yet women are the key actors in agriculture production and reproduction. Micro, meso and macro level extension systems and structures were also anchored onto the patriarchal power setting thus obscure how women and men access production resources in their HHs in pursuit of livelihood streams. Thus, there is need for equitable technical advice to principle HHs members and examination of the composition of AESs structure as well as deconstructing HH power and control structure in pursuit of improved livelihood. This will empower women who are the linchpin of HH production and reproduction hence creating foundational pathways for improved livelihood.

References

Adekunle, A. A., Fatunbi, A. O., Buruchara, R., & Nyamwaro, S. (2013). Integrated agricultural research for development: from concept to practice. In Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA), Accra, Ghana.

Adeyemi H. M. M. (2010). Food security: Agriculture and gender relations in postharvest storage. African Research Review, 4, 44–152.

Agarwal, B. (1997). ''Bargaining''and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist economics, 3(1), 1-51.

Asiimwe G. B. (2010). Household gender and resource relations: Women in the marketing arena of income generating crops in Uganda. Eastern Africa Social Science Research Review, 26(2), 1-30.

Baden, S., & Goetz, A. M. (1998). Who needs [sex] when you can have [gender]. Feminist visions of development: gender analysis and policy, 19-38.

Buruchara, R., Tukahirwa, J., Kashaija, I., Farrow, A., Wanjiku, C., Rao, K. P. C., & Kalibwani, R. (2013). Principles, design and processes of integrated agricultural research for development: experiences and lessons from LKPLS under the SSACP. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 8(3), 81-100.

Creswell, J.W. and Clark,V.J.P, (2011). Designing and conducting Mixed Methods Researchm Sage Publications.

Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and mixed methods Approaches, Sage Publications.

Garcia, Z., Nyberg, J., & Saadat, S. O. (2006). Agriculture, trade negotiations and gender. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).

Helmore, K. S. (2001). Sustainable livelihoods: Building on the wealth of the poor (No. 362.52091734 H481). Kumarian Press.

Hodgson, D. L., & McCurdy, S. A. (2001). 'Wicked'Women and the Reconfiguration of Gender in Africa.

Implications for Extension Organizations.” Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 6 (3):145–56

Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender equality and women's empowerment: A critical analysis of the third millennium development goal 1. Gender & Development, 13(1), 13-24

Koopman, J. (1991). Agricultural household models and African agricultural households: Can the data be squeezed into a unitary household model. Review of Radical Political Economics, 23(3-4), 148-173.

Magezi-Apuuli, J.B. (2004). Integrated Framework for the Development of Agricultural Statistics in Uganda. A presentation to the participants of the International Conference on Agricultural Statistics (ICAS) III Cancun, Mexico; 2nd – 4th November

Manyire, H. (2009). Liberalisation of agricultural markets, livelihood patterns and gender relations in Central Uganda: The case of Ntenjeru Sub County, Mukono District (Doctoral dissertation, Makerere University).

Manyire, H., & Apekey, A. D. (2013). Mainstreaming gender equality in African agricultural research and development: A study of constraints and opportunities. Accra, Ghana: Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA).

Moore, H. L. (1988). Feminism and anthropology. U of Minnesota Press.

National Development Plan (2010/11-2014/15), Kampala, Uganda

Nkonya E. (2009). IFPRI: INTERNATIONAL FOOD N expert group meeting on “SLM and agricultural practices in Africa: Bridging the gap between research and farmers” April 16 – 17, 2009, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist economics, 9(2-3), 33-59.

Olsen, C, and St George, D.M.(2004). Cross Sectional Study Design and data analysis. YES Chicago, USA.

Sen, A. (1990). Gender and Co-operative Conflict ‘in Irene Tinker (ed), Persistent Inequalities.

Tripp, A. M. (2000). Women and politics in Uganda. Oxford and Kampala: James Curry and Fountain.

Uganda Bureau of Statistics. (2014, November). National Population and Housing Census 2014. Provisional Results. Revised Edition. Kampala.

Uganda National Population Study Report (2013/14), Kampala, Uganda

Whitehead, A. and Tsikata, D. (2003). “Policy Discourses on Women’s Land Rights in Sub-Saharan Africa”, Journal of Agrarian Change 3: 1 and 2.World Bank. 1975. Land Reform Policy. Washington D.C.: Land Policy Division.

Whitehead, A., Young, K., Wolkowitz, C., & McCullagh, R. (1981). Of marriage and the market: Women's subordination in international perspective.

The World Bank. (2016). Global Monitoring Report.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-11

How to Cite

Mbabazi, P., B. Asiimwe, G., & Kazooba, C. T. (2018). The Impact of Intra-Household Gender Relations in Accessing Agricultural Extension Services for Improved Livelihoods: The Case of NAADS Beneficiary Sub-Counties in Kabale District. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 38(2), 89–107. Retrieved from https://www.gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/8754

Issue

Section

Articles