Internal Internal Audit for Accountability: Perceived Usefulness by Employees at Mbarara University of Science and Technology in UgandaAudit for Accountability: Perceived Usefulness by Employees at Mbarara University of Science and Technology in Uganda
AbstractConsidering the Auditor General’s Report (2013) for Uganda, Public universities spend money without due authorization. This concern raises questions about the internal audit function and whether internal audit improves accountability among public universities. In view of these questions, the article describes how employees at Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST) perceive the usefulness of internal audit for university accountability. Hence, a cross sectional survey design using a questionnaire tool was administered to 196 out of 403 staff of MUST to understand the perceived usefulness of internal audit for accountability. The article reveals that internal audit is perceived useful because it facilitates  the university to focus its activities towards achievement of set objectives and  financial accountability through compliance measures with set internal controls. The study concludes that when internal audit is ignored due to collusion, then accountability is flouted. The study recommends strengthening the internal audit positioning, equipping and training staff in E-Systems audit, and maintaining an environment where internal auditors have freedom to independently perform their tasks for better accountability. Strengthen internal audit is a panacea to better accountability at MUST.
E. Ferlie, L. Fitzgerald, and A. Pettigrew, The new public management in action: OUP Oxford, 1996.
P. Brown, H. Lauder, D. Ashton, and G. Tholen, Education, globalisation and the knowledge economy, a commentary for the ESRC Teaching and Learning Research Programme (TLRP): TLRP, 2008.
A. Sawyerr, "Challenges facing African universities: Selected issues," African studies review, pp. 1-59, 2004.
C. Narcisa, E. Hlaciuc, and A. Maria Zaiceanu, The Impact and Results of the Internal Audit Activity Exercised in the Public Sector in Romania vol. 32, 2015.
H. I. Chiggai, "Effect Of Internal Audit Practices On Organization Performance: A Case Of Regulatory Bodies In Kenya," KCA University, 2016.
J. Kiyaga-Nsubuga, R. Magyezi, S. O’Brien, and M. Sheldrake, "Hope for the urban poor: DFID city community challenge (C3) fund pilot in Kampala and Jinja, Uganda," Environment and Urbanization, vol. 13, pp. 115-124, 2001.
U. Kakumba and D. J. Fourie, "Enhancing local government systems and processes towards accountability: the case for external control Agencies in Uganda," Journal of Public Administration, vol. 43, pp. 121-135, 2008.
Auditor General Office, "Perfomance report," ed, 2013-2014.
P. M. Brewerton and L. J. Millward, Organizational research methods: A guide for students and researchers: Sage, 2001.
R. V. Krejcie, Morgan, D. W. , Determining Sample Size for Research Activities”, Educational and Psychological Measurement., 1970.
I. E. Allen and C. A. Seaman, "Likert scales and data analyses," Quality progress, vol. 40, pp. 64-65, 2007.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- By submitting the processing fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.
- It should be clear for authors that the Editor In Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper. The Editor In Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor In Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 7 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor In Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he have the right to accept\reject the paper.B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s). C. the Editor In Chief himself evaluates the paper.
- Author will take the responsibility what so ever if any copyright infringement or any other violation of any law is done by publishing the research work by the author
- Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.
- If at any time, due to any legal reason, if the journal stops accepting manuscripts or could not publish already accepted manuscripts, we will have the right to cancel all or any one of the manuscripts without any compensation or returning back any kind of processing cost.
- The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.