Establishing Agro-Enterprises towards Inclusive Development: The Case of Nueva Segovia Consortium of Cooperatives in the Philippines

  • Clarice C. Pulumbarit Department of Social Development Services, College of Human Ecology, University of the Philippines Los Banos (UPLB), Laguna 4030, Philippines
  • Emilia S. Visco Department of Social Development Services, College of Human Ecology, UPLB, Laguna 4030, Philippines
  • Carla Edith G. Jimena Department of Social Development Services, College of Human Ecology, UPLB, Laguna 4030, Philippines
  • Nimfa Beatris D. Montes Department of Agribusiness Management and Entrepreneurship, College of Economics and Management, UPLB, Laguna 4030, Philippines
  • Jewel Joanna S. Cabardo Department of Agribusiness Management and Entrepreneurship, College of Economics and Management, UPLB, Laguna 4030, Philippines
  • Ma. Emilinda T. Mendoza Department of Social Development Services, College of Human Ecology, UPLB, Laguna 4030, Philippines
Keywords: agro-enterprise, agro-enterprise development, inclusive development.


This study analyzed the case of a local cooperative in the Philippines engaged in agro-enterprise development (AED). It aimed to gather microlevel insight on AED’s contribution to inclusive development, in the context of inclusive agri-business. The researchers profiled the AED initiatives of the Nueva Segovia Consortium of Cooperatives (NSCC), determined the challenges in implementing these initiatives, and analyzed the perceived impacts of the initiatives on the beneficiaries in relation to inclusive development. Data were gathered through key informant interview, focus group discussion, and review of project documents. Based on NSCC’s experience, key informants perceive that the AED initiatives have led to material, cognitive, perceptual, and relational change in its beneficiaries. These resulted from continuous capacity building and directly linking farmers to modern value chains through agro-enterprise development. The changes contribute to empowering the member farmers thereby promoting inclusive development at the local level. The key challenges faced by NSCC are related to production and the policy and institutional landscape for agro-enterprise development. Addressing these challenges, as well as capacitating the agro-enterprises to implement post-production value-adding activities, can maximize the gains towards inclusive development. In-depth studies on the impacts of agro-enterprises on beneficiaries are recommended to further substantiate the potential of agro-enterprise development to promote inclusiveness.


G. Rauniyar and R. Kanbur. (2009, December). Inclusive Growth and Inclusive Development: A Review and Synthesis of Asian Development Bank Literature. Metro Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. [On-line]. Available: [October 10, 2016].

J. Gupta and C. Vegelin. (2016, June). “Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law, and Economics. [On-line]. 16 (3), pp. 433-448. Available: [September 1, 2017].

WB, 2018

K. Schwab. (2009). The Global Competitiveness Report 2018. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum. [On-line]. Available: [October 1, 2018]

L. Cotula and R. Leonard (eds). Alternatives to Land Acquisitions: Agricultural Investment and Collaborative Business Models. London: IIED; Berne: SDC; Rome: IFAD; Maputo, Mozambique: Centro Terra Viva (CTV), 2010, 133pp.

P. S. Teng and J. A.P. Oliveros. 2016. The enabling environment for inclusive agribusiness in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development. [On-line]. 13 (2), pp. 1-19. Available: [October 15, 2017]

M. Rankin, E.G. Nogales, P. Santacoloma, N. Mhlanga, & C. Rizzo. Public–Private Partnerships for Agribusiness Development – A Review of International Experiences. Rome, Italy: FAO. [On-line]. Available: [October 5, 2017]

S. Ferris, P. Robbins, R. Best, D. Seville, A. Buxton, J. Shriver, E. Wei and MEAS Project. (2014, May). Linking Smallholder Farmers to Markets and the Implications for Extension and Advisory Services. MEAS Discussion Paper 4. [On-line]. Available: [June 5, 2016]

OECD and World Bank. (2015, October 6). Inclusive Global Value Chains: Policy Options in Trade and Complementary Aspects for GVC Integration by Small and Medium Enterprises and Low-income Developing Countries. [On-line]. Available: [September 10, 2018]

S. Vermeulen and L. Cotula. (2010). Making the Most of Agricultural Investment: A Survey of Business Models that Provide Opportunities for Smallholders. Rome: FAO and Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). [On-line] Available: [September 30, 2018]

CRS. (2014, August). Moving Together to the Market: The Clustering Approach to Agroenterprise Development for Small Farmers. 2nd Ed. Baltimore, Maryland, USA: CRS. [On-line] Available: [May 5, 2015]

S. Ferris, E. Kaganzi, R. Best, C. Ostertag, M. Lundy, and T. Wandschneider. 2006. A Market Facilitator's Guide to Participatory Agroenterprise Development. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT). Cali, Colombia. [On-line]. Available: [February 10, 2015]

M. Lundy, M.V. Gottret, C. Ostertag, R. Best, & S. Ferris. (2007). Participatory Market Chain Analysis for Smallholder Producers. Colombia: CIAT. [On-line]. Available: [February 15, 2015]

Philippine Statistics Authority. “Poverty incidence among Filipinos registered at 21.6% in 2015 – PSA.” Internet:, (October 27, 2016) [September 12, 2018]

C.E.J. Jimena, Pulumbarit, C.C., Montes, N.B.D., Visco, E.S., Cabardo, J.J.S., & Mendoza, M.E.T. (2016). Linking Microenterprises to Modern Value Chains: Case Studies in the Philippines. Research Report. [On-line] Available: [January 20, 2018]

____________________. “Location and Land Area.” Internet: [August 5, 2018]

National Economic and Development Authority Regional Office 1. (2017). Ilocos Regional Development Plan 2017-2022. La Union, Philippines: National Economic and Development Authority Regional Office 1. [On-line]. Available: [January 30, 2018]

J. Hartley. (2004). “Case study research.” Essential guide to qualitative methods in organisational research. C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.). London: Sage Publications Ltd, pp. 323-333.

International Labor Organization. (2007). The promotion of sustainable enterprises. International Labor Conference, 96th Session. ILO, Geneva. [On-line]. Available: [February 10, 2015]

M.A. Chen. (1997). A Guide for Assessing the Impact of Microenterprise Services at the Individual Level. Assessing the Impacts of Microenterprise Services Project. Washington D.C., USA: Management Systems International.

Cooperative Development Authority. “Nueva Segovia Consortium of Cooperatives.” Internet: [February 6, 2017]

Jollibee Group Foundation. “Farmer Entrepreneurship Program.” Internet: [May 1, 2015]

L. Pagliettie and R. Sabrie. (2013). Review of Smallholder Linkages for Inclusive Agribusiness Development. Good Practices in Investment Design. Rome: FAO. [On-line]. Available: [August 10, 2018]

D. Domenico, V. Blok, T. Lans & R. Wesselink. (2012). “Developing Human Capital for Agri-Food Firms’ Multi-Stakeholder Interactions.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. 15 (Special Issue A), pp61-68. [On-line] Available: [August 9, 2018]