The Effect of Retention Interval Over a Three Year Period on the Elementary Algebra Performance of High School Students
AbstractThis study provided empirical evidence on the effect of retention interval on the student’s performance in elementary algebra mathematics among High School Students. The subjects were the grade 8, grade 9 and grade 10 students of the University Laboratory School, University of Southern Mindanao, Philippines for school year 2012-2013 who took their elementary algebra in their grade 7 in the school under the same instructor. The results of the respondents’ grade 7 exam taken prior to the conduct of study was the initial test were used for comparison to their present retest result. Results revealed that there was a highly significant difference between the achievement during and after instruction of the participants according to their year level. Gain in performance across retention interval group were highly significant. Retention interval supplemented enough time for the students to practice what was previously learned as they engaged to new but highly related mathematics courses. Further, exposure to different academic trials facilitated development of expertise and mathematical academic maturity on the students contributed to the increase in gain with increasing retention interval. Thus, retention interval was found to be advantageous in mathematics if practiced and elaborated.
. I.V.S Mullis, M.O. Martin, E. J. Gonzales & S. J. Chrostowski. (2004) TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report. [on line]. Available: https://timss.bc.edu/PDF/t03_download/T03INTLMATRPT.pdf, (Feb. 2,2019]
. A.D. Parena and D.L. H. Dinglasan. “Students’ performance on the departmental examination: Basis for math intervention program”. “Asian Academic Research Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities”, vol. 1, issue 14, pp. 255-268, Aug. 2013
. T.P. Alloway, S.E. Gathercole, and J. Elliott, (2010). “Examining the link between working memory behavior and academic attainment in children with ADHD". Developmental medicine and child neurology, vol. 52(7), pp. 632-636. Available: https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03603.x
. S.E. Gathercole, S.J. Pickering, B. Ambridge and H. Wearing. “The Structure of Working Memory from 4 to 15 Years of Age”. Developmental Psychology, vol. 40(2), pp. 177-190, Mar. 2004..
. R.S. Siegler and J.L.Booth. “Development of numerical estimation: A review”. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition. New York, NY, US: Psychology Press. 2005, pp. 197-212.
. P.L. Ayres.” Systematic mathematical errors and cognitive load”. Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol.26 (2), pp.227-248, Apr.2001
. J.W. Adams, G.J. Hitch.” Working memory and children's mental addition”. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, vol.6 7(1), pp. 21-38, Oct.1997.
. H. Ebbinghaus. Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Ruger& C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). New York: Dover, 1964 (Original work published 1885)
. H.P. Bahrick, E. Phelps “Retention of Spanish vocabulary over 8 years”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, vol.13 (2), pp.344-349. Apr 1987
. A. D. Baddeley and D.J.A Longman, “The influence of length and frequency on training sessions on the rate of learning to type”. Ergonomics, vol. 21, pp. 627-635, 1978
. J. Richmond, P. Sowerby and H. Hayne “The effect of familiarization time, retention interval and context change in adults’ performance in visual-paired compare on task”. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psychobiol, vol. 44, pp.146–155, Mar 2004.
. A. S. Posamentier, B. S. Smith and J. S. Stepelman. Teaching secondary mathematics (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn& Bacon, 2010
. P. Pauli, L.E. Bourne, N. Nirbaumer. “Extensive practice in mental arithmetic and practice transfer over a ten-month retention interval”. Mathematical Cognition, vol. 4 (1), pp.21–46, 1998
. D.W. Fendrich, A.F. Healy and L.E. Bourne Jr. “Mental arithmetic: Training and retention of multiplication skill”. In C. Izawa (Ed.), Applied cognitive psychology: Applications of cognitive theories and concepts, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1993, pp. 111–133,
. G.L. Gates “A review of the effects of interspersing procedures on the stages of academic skill development”. Journal of Behavioral Education, vol14, pp.305-325, 2005
. C. R. Greenwood, J. Delquadri and R.V. Hall “Opportunity to respond and student academic performance”. In W. Heward, T. Heron, D. Hill, & J. Trap Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education, Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill, 1984, pp.58-88.
. C.H. Skinner, K. Hall-Johnson, A.L. Skinner, G.L. Cates, G.A. Johns and J. Webber. “Enhancing students’ perceptions of mathematics assignments by increasing relative problem completion rates through the interspersal technique”. Journal of Experimental Education, vol.68, pp. 43-59, 1999
. J. P. Byrnes. Cognitive Development and learning in instructional contexts. Boston: Allen & Bacon, 1996
. D. F. Bjorklund. “Cognitive development: An overview”. In P. D. Zelazo (Ed.), Oxford handbook of developmental psychology, New York: Oxford University Press, 2011, in press
. F.I.M. Craik and R. S. Lockhart. (1972), “Levels of processing: A framework for memory research”. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vol.11, pp. 671-684, Available: http://wixtedlab.ucsd.edu/publications/Psych%20218/Craik_Lockhart_1972.pdf, [Dec.2, 2016]
. J. W. Santrock . Educational Psychology (5th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011
. K.A. Ericsson, R.T. Krampe and C. Teschromer. “Three aspects of cognitive development”. In D. Shanks (Ed.), Psychology of learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2009
. M. A. Nippold. “School-age children talk about chess: Does knowledge drive syntactic complexity”, Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, vol.38, pp.131–142. 2009
. National Research Council. (Apr.1999). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academic Press. available: https://www.desu.edu/sites/flagship/files/document/16/how_people_learn_book.pdf, [Dec. 4,2018]
. J. Bransford, B. Barron, R. Pea, A. Meltzoff, P. Kuhl, P. Bell, R. Stevens, D. Schwartz, N. Vye, B. Reeves, .J. Roschelle and N. Sabelli. “Foundations and opportunities for an interdisciplinary science”. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
. M. I. Posner and M.K. Rothbart. Educating the human brain. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2007
. J.P. Byrnes (Jun 2003). “Factors predictive of mathematics achievement in White, Black, and Hispanic 12th graders”. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.95, pp.316-326, Available: https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-06126.96.36.1996 [Dec 3, 2016]
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- By submitting the processing fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.
- It should be clear for authors that the Editor In Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper. The Editor In Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor In Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 7 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor In Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he have the right to accept\reject the paper.B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s). C. the Editor In Chief himself evaluates the paper.
- Author will take the responsibility what so ever if any copyright infringement or any other violation of any law is done by publishing the research work by the author
- Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.
- If at any time, due to any legal reason, if the journal stops accepting manuscripts or could not publish already accepted manuscripts, we will have the right to cancel all or any one of the manuscripts without any compensation or returning back any kind of processing cost.
- The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.